Australian student, 1500 words, HARVARD REFERENCING and INTEXT REFERENCING MUST. I NEED AT LEAST 5 REFERENCING and Please provide best work only. Presentation: Times New Roman font, 12-point font-size, 1.5 or double-spaced line spacing, 2.54 cm margins and 1-line spacing between paragraphs. Within +/– 10% of word limit. Demonstrates clear and coherent writing style in first or third person perspective. Demonstrates detailed attention to essay structure, expression, spelling, punctuation and grammar. Provides minimum five (5) references, correctly formatted in-text and in List of References in Harvard style. See Assessment Details on MySCU for more instructions.

MARKING CRITERIA: This paper will be evaluated using an adaptation of the “Critical Thinking Rubric” created by the Critical Thinking Project at Washington State University and will be assessed on overall presentation and the following four areas: Does your paper reflect your own perspective and position? (e.g., are you clearly writing about your approach and not simply describing someone else’s), Do you identify and assess the key assumptions that underlie your perspective and position? (e.g., do you talk about how you arrived at your theory/model or do you simply state your conclusions?) Do you identify and consider the influence of context on your approach? (e.g., do you describe how your approach applies to the specific context and setting of your profession?) Do you identify and assess the logical conclusions, implications, and/or consequences of acting on your approach to leadership? (e.g., do you describe how your professional life and work setting would be different if your approach were practiced by you and by others?)

Identifies, appropriately, one’s own position on the issue, drawing support from experience, and additional information not available from assigned sources. Recognises other valid points of view and counter-arguments that may be made and responds to them. Identifies and addresses the validity of the key assumptions and ethical dimensions that underlie the issue. Analyses the issue with a clear sense of scope and context, including an assessment of the audience of the analysis. Considers other pertinent contexts.

Identifies and discusses conclusions, implications, and consequences considering context, assumptions, data, and evidence. Objectively reflects upon their own assertions. Correct formatting throughout. Within +/– 10% of word limit. Clear and coherent writing style in first or third person perspective. Detailed attention to essay structure, expression, spelling, punctuation and grammar. Provides minimum five (5) references, correctly formatted in-text and List of References in Harvard style.