Explain kant second formulation of categorical imperative

Assignment Help Other Subject

Reference no: EM13986924

I. Explain Kant's second formulation of the categorical imperative? Offer three examples of how one could violate it.

Is it ethical to ask an employee to work somewhere dangerous? If you were the boss, how would you make sure that your employee understood the risks and agreed to them?

II. Is it ever right to lie? Why or why not? Use the text in your response (obviously not word for word).

What are good reasons to bluff? Why could bluffing be bad in business? Explain your own view on bluffing in business. Do you view "bullshitting" in business the same way?

III. Why does integrity matter?

Explain Aristotle's understanding of the good life. Does it agree with your own view? With a Judeo-Christian view? What appeals to you about Aristotle's understanding of the good life, and where do you think he went wrong?

IV. Why is ‘doing the right thing' often different than "doing the legal thing"? Why might the distinction between what is moral and what is legal be of particular concern to accountants and other kinds of financial auditors and overseers?

Explain the two chief harm-based arguments against insider trading. What does Moore say about these arguments? Can you identify another problem with either argument?

V. What is the "Bentonville Menace"? What duties do giant corporations have to the societies on which they depend and to the individual members of those societies?

Contrast the reformation view of work with the view of the work you believe is prevalent in contemporary life.

VI. Explain the basics of stakeholder theory as if you are talking to a friend.

Should a corporation care about the interests of people other than shareholders? How would a corporation behave differently if it accepted a shareholder theory versus a stakeholder theory?

Basic on the book " Honest Work" A BUSINESS ETHICS READERS --- THIRD EDITION

Reference no: EM13986924

Questions Cloud

Calculate tax revenue and excludability matters : Excludability matters because it: Any cost that is imposed without compensation on someone other than the person who caused it is called: Correcting a market with an externality through taxation is _________ correcting it through a quota. Calculate t..

If someone appears to be violating the consistency principle : Aristotle wrote in the Nicomachean Ethics that ethical virtues are what? "If someone appears to be violating the consistency principle, then the burden of proof is on that person to show he or she is in fact not violating the principle." What fallacy..

What should be the mass of object : What should be the mass of object B? The numbers in the figure indicate the relative lengths of the rods on each side of their supporting cords.

What is the inductive fallacy of hasty generalization : What is the inductive "fallacy of hasty generalization"? What does "attacking the analogy" mean? What is the difference between an explanation and an argument?

Explain kant second formulation of categorical imperative : Explain Kant's second formulation of the categorical imperative? Offer three examples of how one could violate it. Is it ethical to ask an employee to work somewhere dangerous

How do we work the categorical operation called obversion : How do we work the categorical operation called obversion? What is the purpose of studying a sample? In studying a sample, what is meant by the term sampling frame?

Entitlement spending and all externalities : When negative externalities are present, it means that: All externalities: The distribution of surplus received from a subsidy offered in a market where a positive externality is present depends on: Entitlement spending:

What is the personal ad hominem fallacy : What is the purpose of the rhetorical device called hyperbole? What is the personal ad hominem fallacy? To the overall topic of burden of proof, what is the purpose of the rule called affirmative/negative plausibility?

What is meaning of the rhetorical device called a stereotype : What is grouping ambiguity? If a claim is made by a disinterested party, we know that. What is the meaning of the rhetorical device called a stereotype?

User Account

All Pages