Reference no: EM133483551
Case: Read the journal entitled "Clinical impact of influenza vaccination after ST- and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction - insights from the IAMI trial"
Provide the following
Summary: A brief summary of the article, including the hypothesis, the design of the study, the subjects and measures used, and the results.
Content comparison: Compare the abstract of the study (found at the beginning of the article) and the actual study information long-form information in the rest of the article to see it there are any discrepancies. If so, make note of them and hypothesize reasons for them. If not confirm the summary is accurate.
Discussion:
Question 1: Discuss the authors results utilizing information that you have learned in class about the relevant body
Question 2: Describe how what you have learned in class helps you to understand the study.
Question 3: Give examples where people have or could misconstrue data from the study.
Question 4: Do the data support the conclusions or do you think the authors are stretching to reach the conclusions that they draw? Look for a table or a figure in the article that supports the authors' conclusions.
Question 5: Do you find any flaws with the study, either in the hypothesis or execution?
Question 6: How would you correct these? Explain how you would change the conclusion or results section to more accurately reflect the study results and laws