Explain aquinas argument in two parts

Reference no: EM132895255

Aquinas on the Uniqueness of God

Aquinas's arguments are designed to establish the existence of a being that differs radically from ordinary objects in various important respects. The First Way starts from the fact that ordinary objects are moved and seeks to show that there is at least one thing that is not caused, and so on. In each case, Aquinas writes as if his argument shows something stronger, namely, that exactly one being possesses the remarkable quality in question. He does not give an argument for this claim.

Question 1: Explain Aquinas's argument in two parts. First, produce an argument for the conclusion that there is at least one being with the remarkable property (an uncaused thing) in question. Second, try to complete the argument by showing that there can be at most one such being.

Reference no: EM132895255

Questions Cloud

Philosophies mentioned strategy of Plan : One of the philosophies mentioned the strategy of Plan, elaborate how together you will disseminate this plan to the entire company.

Why does not god do likewise : Imagine what it would be like to live in a world in which we were protected from human evil in this way. Would such a world be worse in any way?

Construct the argument from animal suffering : Construct a response to the argument from animal suffering on the behalf of the theist. Any such response must point to a believable

Rough Business Plan : Create a rough outline of a business plan for your approved topic. You can use headings and bullet points to do this.

Explain aquinas argument in two parts : Explain Aquinas's argument in two parts. First, produce an argument for the conclusion that there is at least one being with the remarkable property

What do neuroscience development have in common : What do neuroscience, positive psychology, and organizational development have in common, and how can those in leadership roles utilize

Do think is permissible for everyone to eat animals : You should also clarify the scope of your view. For instance, do you think it is permissible for everyone to eat animals that were killed for food

Terrorist attacks and continuing influx of refugees : It has yet found a coherent response to deal with terrorist attacks and the continuing influx of the refugees

Does kantianism provide a plausible theory of right conduct : Does Kantianism provide a plausible theory of right conduct? If you think that it does, then (i) spell out the strongest objection that opponents of Kantianism

User Account

All Pages