Exceeding the appropriate authority for prosecution

Assignment Help Other Subject

Reference no: EM133809346

Question

One example of exceeding the appropriate authority for prosecution or defense isdestroying evidence. No prosecutor would destroy evidence proving a defendant committed acrime. Prosecutors have the most influence in courtrooms. Prosecutors must prove guilt beyond areasonable doubt. The destruction of evidence that could prove a defendant is guilty is notacceptable as it is their responsibility. An acquittal can result from the destruction of evidence.An attorney or prosecutor destroying evidence is both immoral and unethical, plus illegal. "First,it can lead to wholly innocent individuals being convicted of crimes they did not commit."(Hanson, 2023). A prosecutor or defense attorney shouldn't withhold the truth. 1 John 2:21, "Idon't write to you because you don't know the truth but because you know it. You know that nolie comes from the truth." (Common English Bible, 2013). As a result, a guilty individual wouldremain free. Attorneys should protect client information. Any information implicating a clientwould be immoral. Legal representation creates a fair society. The same standards apply toprosecutors. It is his or her duty to ensure justice is done. "Violations of the law must beprosecuted, but in a way that guarantees that the defendant's rights are respected and protected."(Neubauer and Fradella, 2019). A prosecutor or defendant's attorney taking such actions is arisky move. Bringing facts to light, defending clients, and ensuring justice are served areimperative for attorneys. Ultimately, God leads everyone down their path. Legitimacy dependson the court system exercise.

Reference no: EM133809346

Questions Cloud

Exemplary employee : You work for Allen Steel for 10 years, and are an exemplary employee. But you just got a new manager a few months ago, and she is a real piece of work.

Explain the drawbacks of magistrates courts : Explain the drawbacks of Magistrates Courts. How did the local citizens try to solve these problems?

Speech act materially and substantially disrupts : How should the courts determine whether a given speech act materially and substantially disrupts the work and discipline of the school?

Zedonk fall within the four categories of patentable subject : Does the zedonk fall within the four categories of patentable subject matter? Is it excluded under one of the three exceptions that Supreme Court has set out?

Exceeding the appropriate authority for prosecution : Exceeding the appropriate authority for prosecution or defense isdestroying evidence. No prosecutor would destroy evidence proving a defendant committed acrime.

Identify all instances of conduct by greenstein : Identify all instances of conduct by Greenstein for which an investigation should have been opened.

Federal drug enforcement administration : California, received information from the federal Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) that a chemist was arriving from overseas with the express purpose

Resolves conflicts of law regarding marijuana : Draft a federal law, that resolves conflicts of law regarding marijuana. The resources found in your required reading and online learning resources.

One of the remaining beneficiaries might contest : One of the remaining beneficiaries might contest the contents of the handwritten memorandum. How does the term extrinsic evidence apply to this situation?

User Account

All Pages