Examining the claims or arguments in more depth

Reference no: EM132556277

Assignment: Your initial discussion thread is due and you have to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses. Reference the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric for guidance on how your discussion will be evaluated.

Deductive Logic

Your instructor will choose the discussion question and post it as the first response in the discussion forum. The requirements for this discussion are a minimum of four posts on four separate days. The total combined word count for all of your posts for this discussion, counted together, should be at least 400 words. Answer all the questions in the prompt, and read any resources that are required to complete the discussion properly. In order to satisfy the posting requirements for the week, complete your initial post by Day 3 (Thursday) and your other posts by Day 7 (Monday). We recommend that you get into the discussion early and spread out your posts over the course of the week. Reply to your classmates and instructor. Attempt to take the conversation further by examining their claims or arguments in more depth or responding to the posts that they make to you. Keep the discussion on target, and analyze things in as much detail as you can.

Reference no: EM132556277

Questions Cloud

Determine total number of people who fail diagnostic test : Construct a 2-by-2 contingency table to determine the total number of people who fail the diagnostic test, which represents the target market for hearing aid.

Write a reply that interacts with your classmate thread : After reading your classmates' threads, choose one to which you will respond, then write a reply that interacts with your classmate's thread and presents.

Explain about a mental illness and a physical illness : Think about a mental illness and a physical illness that might be connected. Consider the impact of mental illness on physical illness and vice versa.

What you take to be the strongest possible argument : Construct what you take to be the strongest possible argument for a conclusion contrary to the one you argued for in your Week One paper.

Examining the claims or arguments in more depth : In order to satisfy the posting requirements for the week, complete your initial post by Day 3 (Thursday) and your other posts by Day 7 (Monday).

Discuss about a mental illness and a physical illness : Think about a mental illness and a physical illness that might be connected. Consider the impact of mental illness on physical illness and vice versa.

Explain how your conclusion follows from your premises : Explain how your conclusion follows from your premises. For an example of how to complete this paper, take a look at the Week One Annotated Example The Ethics.

Compare universalism and relativism in detail : A common debate in ethics is universalism versus relativism of ethics and moral codes. A frequently asked question is "Does a universal moral code exist.

Evaluate how the risk could best be mitigated : As the world continues to become more global because of technological advances, the risks will increase. Choose one of the global risk areas: economic.

User Account

All Pages