Thank you so much I read what you have done. It is really good...I just want you and Expertsmind to know that I am always really happy with your work and I wouldn't go to anyone else! I am just glad that I know I would never get a plagiarized paper from Expertsmind...keep up the good work!

I have not been provided with the case study from Uni. You will have to find it online. Please let me know if u can't do it coz I need the assignment asap. If u can't find it please refund me the money. Amazing, the solution is really so useful and I will for sure refer my friends to use your service.

Written Assignment: Illustrate the role, purpose and scope of the relevant court, or tribunal. The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were perfectly clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct. The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were perfectly clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct. The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were very clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct. The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were fairly clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct. The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were absent. ASSESSMENT TOTAL SUBJECT TOTAL

Written Assignment: Discuss the legal arguments raised by the parties in case All the legal argumentsare clearly and accurately detailed, and there is a synthesis withthe relevant law. All the legal argumentsare clearly and accurately detailed. Most of legal argumentsare clearly and accurately summarised. Some of the legal argumentsare clearly and accurately outlined in brief. The legal arguments are clearly or accurately outlined. Written Assignment: Summarise the judgement of the case The decision of the judge is accurately detailed with reference to any dissenting judgements or precedents. The decision of the judge is accurately detailed. The decision of the judge is accurately summarised in summary format. The decision of the judge is accurately outlined in brief. The decision of the judge is inaccurate or incomplete.

Written Assignment: Identify the facts of the case All of the facts are clearly and accurately detailed with reference to cases with similar facts. All of the facts are clearly and accurately detailed. All of the relevant law is clearly and accurately summarised. Someof the facts are clearly and accurately outlined in brief. The facts are not clearly or accurately outlined. Written Assignment: Explain the relevant law relating to the case All of the relevant law is clearly and accurately detailed, and the Act and related cases are referenced and discussed. All of the relevant law is clearly and accurately detailed. Mostof the relevant law is clearly and accurately summarised. Someof the relevant law is clearly and accurately outlined in brief. The relevant law is not clearly or accurately outlined.

Criteria High Distinction 80% - Distinction 70%- 79% Credit 60-69% Group oral presentation and visual slides At all times: 1. the group was cohesive and courteous; 2. the oral presentations were clear and understandable; 3. the oral presentations were accurate or precise in relation to the details of the case; engaging; 4. the presentation slides were logical and structured; and 5. the oral presentations were interesting and engaging. At all times: 1. the group was cohesive and courteous; 2. the oral presentations were clear and understandable; 3. the oral presentations were accurate or precise in relation to the details of the case; and 4. the presentation slides were logical and structured. Most of the times: 1. the group was cohesive and courteous; 2. the oral presentations were clear and understandable; 3. the oral presentations were accurate or precise in relation to the details of the case; and 4. the presentation slides were logical and structured.

Written Assignment: Discuss the legal arguments raised by the parties in case 10% Written Assignment: Summarise the judgement of the case 10% Written Assignment: Illustrate the role, purpose and scope of the relevant court, or tribunal. 10% ASSESSMENT TOTAL 100% SUBJECT TOTAL /40%

5. Each member of the group is to present two parts of the IRAC method (I= issues and facts; Relevant laws and principles; A= Arguments of the parties and analysis, C= conclusion and court outcome). 6. The task is worth a total of 40% of your final marks. Group presentation and assignment Assessment and Feedback Form Group Members& SID’s: Term/Date: Group oral presentation and visual slides 50% Written Assignment: Identify the facts of the case 10% Written Assignment: Explain the relevant law relating to the case 10%

1. Form a group of 2 students. 2. Select a case below to find, read, understand and present. Once a case has been selected by a group, that case is not open for other groups to select. 3. The length of the written assignment is to be approximately 2000 Words.(Each member of the group must write 1000 words). 4. The written assignment and presentation slides must be in the IRAC method. Maximum 8 slides with around three short points per slide.