Examine prosecution witnesses

Reference no: EM133313333

Assignment:

Romaria is a Contracting State to the ECHR. Two years ago, Felipe, a Romarian citizen, was arrested. After three days of questioning, he was finally charged with a driving offence. His request for a lawyer at the police station was denied on the ground that he was unable to afford legal fees.

Prior to the trial, which took place last month, the prosecution refused to disclose its evidence. During the trial, from which the press were excluded, neither Felipe nor his lawyer were permitted to cross examine prosecution witnesses.

Under Romarian law, judges are normally appointed for life by an independent panel of senior judges, on the grounds of qualifications, competence and experience of advocacy. However, the same law gives the President of Romaria the power to appoint judges, on a temporary basis, if they are "appropriate persons". Of the three judges presiding over Felipe's trial, two were appointed by the normal procedure and one directly by the President on a rolling one month contract.

The trial was conducted entirely in Polenian, a minority language spoken in the area of Romaria in which Felipe lived. Felipe speaks Romarian, the national language, but not Polenian. His request for a translator was refused.

Felipe was convicted and sentenced to one year's imprisonment. No reasons were given for the judgment, which was given in a written letter to the lawyers for both sides. Felipe was not permitted to appeal.

However, Felipe's woes are not yet at an end. He has also been informed that the Romarian Architects' Council has revoked his licence to practice as an architect. He was not notified of the disciplinary proceedings against him by the Council and has no right of appeal.

Advise Felipe on his likely chances of success in an action alleging breach of Article 6 by the State of Romaria. You should assume that the admissibility criteria are satisfied.

Reference no: EM133313333

Questions Cloud

Compare a terrorism investigation and immediate threat : Contrast a terrorism investigation in which there is an imminent or immediate threat, and a terrorimsm investigation based on allegations of financial support.

Compare the social learning theory hypothesis : How do the authors of the book The Violence Project compare to the Social Learning Theory hypothesis and support their claims.

Discuss restorative justice initiatives : Consider restorative justice initiatives and assess whether these could be incorporated into the criminal justice system to a larger extent.

Discuss unfortunately led to the successful orchestration : We discussed at length the series of events that unfortunately led to the successful orchestration of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

Examine prosecution witnesses : During the trial, from which the press were excluded, neither Felipe nor his lawyer were permitted to cross examine prosecution witnesses.

Define productivity as it relates to policing : If you were a police chief , what techniques and strategies would you use to improve productivity and maintain it at a high level.

What is perspective on the correctional system now : How did it change? What is your perspective on the correctional system now? What are some ways you think you can do to improve it?

What do you believe is the best police selection system : How does title vii if the 1964 civil rights act affect police human resource management. What do you believe is the best police selection system?

Explain drug policy strategies : Two different drug policy strategies have been discussed for dealing with our country's drug problems. The concepts are decriminalization and legalization.

User Account

All Pages