These are the sauces from the book just in case you need it. 26710168_125578901 10211033933099357 527504263 o 2.zip and also need referencing links harvard referrencing standard

Criteria for Assessment This table details the weightings of the five criteria by which your work will be assessed. Criteria Proportion of overall module mark 1. Content (and Learning Outcomes) 25% 2. Knowledge and understanding/application of theory 50% 3. Evidence of reading, use of resources and research 15% 4. Accurate citations and referencing 5% 5. Presentation, grammar and spelling 5% Total 100% Please refer to the Marking Scheme below for information on how work is assessed and graded.

THIRD Makes only a basic attempt to answer the questions. Lacks focus and only a weak attempt 40 – 49 at analysis. Has read some of the immediately relevant literature. Lacks synthesis between the discreet topic areas. MARGINAL FAIL 35 – 39 Fails to understand the basic requirements of the questions. Essentially descriptive work showing only limited understanding and application of ideas. Little evidence of having read the immediately relevant literature. No evidence that relevant subject knowledge has been understood. Little attempt at analysis. POOR FAIL 0 - 34 Poorly organized superficial description with virtually no understanding or analysis of the issues involved. No attempt at synthesis. No evidence of having read the immediately relevant literature or understood basic theory.

Marking Criteria Assessment Criteria for Undergraduate Integrated Assessment level 2 FIRST 70 - 100 The output is well structured and communicated. It is coherent and shows an excellent level of analysis and evaluation with clear signs of originality and insight. Has read and synthesized extensively beyond the immediately relevant reading. The final report is well laid out and successfully brings together all of three of the individual modules. TWO-ONE 60 – 69 The assignment has relevant content which meets all criteria set in the assessment booklet. Clear evidence of independent inquiry and critical judgment in selecting, ordering, analyzing and synthesizing. Has read the immediately relevant literature and to a great extent beyond. Has successfully linked the three module topics together. TWO-TWO Some appropriate theory plus an attempt at analysis but with basic linkage between 50 – 59 theory and analysis. Has read the immediately relevant literature and beyond. Some attempt at bringing the three modules together has been made.

this is Jacky, im currently a part time degree student; course: business & marketing. I am now facing a 2500 words project. May i know how much do u charge. i need the project by 26, so latest is 25 must finish