Reference no: EM133366031
Questions
1. In the Young et al. study with composite faces, which pattern of results provided evidence for the use of holistic processing with upright faces?
A. Equal response times to composite and non-composite faces when faces are inverted, but longer response times to composite than non-composite faces when faces are upright
B. Longer response times for non-composite than composite faces for both upright and inverted faces
C. Equal response times to composite and non-composite faces when faces are upright, but longer response times to composite than non-composite faces when faces are inverted
D. Longer response times for composite than non-composite faces for both upright and inverted faces
2. Which of the following is true when we processing inverted (upside-down) faces?
A. We use holistic processing but not feature processing
B. We use both feature processing and holistic processing
C. We use feature processing but not holistic processing
D. We can't use either feature processing or holistic processing
3. Which of the following is NOT true?
A. Face recognition ability is influenced by genetics
B. Better face recognition ability is associated with more use of holistic/configural processing
C. Better face recognition ability is associated with more use of featural processing
D. Face recognition ability is influenced by experience
E. All of the above are true
4. The results of Tarr and Gauthier's greeble study provide evidence that...
A. the FFA could be activated by non-face objects even before training
B. the FFA is an area good for detailed visual discrimination amongst similar items
C. the FFA did not activate for faces or greebles
D. the FFA is a special face processing area
5. Which of the following is NOT true of prosopagnosics?
A. They cannot recognize a picture of their own face
B. They may be able to recognize objects even if they cannot recognize faces
C. They can visually recognize the faces people they know well, but cannot learn any new faces
D. They have implicit knowledge of the identity of a face, but not explicit knowledge.