Evidence by explaining how the evidence logically supports

Assignment Help Operation Management

Reference no: EM131625459

Using the information from the PowerPoint presentation you created in Module 3, write an Argument Paper that takes a position on the issue you selected. Be sure to include an explanation of the topic, possible viewpoints on the topic, your selected position on the topic, and appropriate evidence to support both your position and that of your possible opponents. Avoid the errors in reasoning that we have studied during the past five weeks by providing your argument in a logically defensible form.

Directions:

Provide a summary introduction that succinctly identifies and explains should people under 18 years old be subject to a legal curfew and or restricted driving, including key terms. Identify and explain one argument (pro or con) related to the chosen issue; either summarize an existing argument or construct an original one.Identify and assess the type of evidence offered in support of the argument position. This will include identifying premises and conclusions. Analyze the evidence by explaining how the evidence logically supports or fails to support the argument's conclusion, and critically evaluate the argument for any reasoning errors, accurately align the argument with the selected topic, and describe the source of the argument.

Next, identify and explain one counter argument (pro or con) should people under 18 years old be subject to a legal curfew and or restricted driving and related to the first argument; either summarize an existing argument or construct an original one.Identify and assess the type of evidence offered in support of the argument position. This will include identifying premises and conclusions.

Analyze the evidence by explaining how the evidence logically supports or fails to support the argument's conclusion, and critically evaluate the argument for any reasoning errors, accurately align the argument with the selected topic, and describe the source of the argument.

Critically assess which of the two arguments is superior; defend the judgment by explaining how and why. Explain the value of critical-thinking analysis in reaching this final conclusion.

Apply current APA standards for editorial style, expression of ideas, and format of text, citations, and references. Professionally present the position using good grammar, spelling, and punctuation

Reference no: EM131625459

Questions Cloud

Definition of campaign and campaign management process : Explain the definition of campaign and campaign management process? The two primary criteria of team success are.

Discussion on environmental sustainability issues : After spending Unit 3 Discussion on environmental sustainability issues, we now return to finding and summarizing issue from your chosen business news source.

Explain the steps in developing crm strategy : Mention the components of CRM strategy. Explain the steps in developing CRM strategy.

Explain the data mining processes : Explain the data mining processes? Explain the decision process of implementation?

Evidence by explaining how the evidence logically supports : Analyze the evidence by explaining how the evidence logically supports or fails to support the argument's conclusion,

The employee refused to violate law : which the employer fired an employee because the employee refused to violate a law which is considered an example of wrongful discharge. "Employment-at-will".

Discuss nature-strength of each of five competitive forces : Briefly discuss the nature and strength of each of the five competitive forces in the coffee industry.

Use three-stage and h-model valuation methods : Growth will transition from 15% down to 5% gradually, If you believe that the transition will take five years, Use three-stage and H-model valuation methods.

In addition to risk-free securities : In addition to risk-free securities, you are currently invested in the Tanglewood Fund,

User Account

All Pages