Evaluating the research communication attempt

Assignment Help Business Law and Ethics

Reference no: EM133281056

Assignment:

The internet is full, and I really mean full, of people and organizations trying to influence the opinions of others and profit from research findings. Some of these people do a good job of accurately representing the findings they use, but others not so much. For this activity, your job is to find an example of someone on the Internet who attempts to use research findings to communicate with a mass audience and evaluate how well they do it. This can be in the format of advertisements, "cyber-banner" articles, news site, press releases, topic-specific discussion forums, etc. (note: it should preferably be written communication, video format will be a bit more cumbersome).

Below is a framework to use in evaluating the research communication attempt, review your information and identify how many of these questions you can answer, describing your conclusions for each.

- Could the event or relationship have happened by chance (e.g., you happen to have a car accident on the day a psychic predicted that your car would fail)?

- Is there a comparison control group to evaluate the performance of the experimental group? We might see an improvement in the experimental group, but would it have occurred anyway without any kind of treatment or intervention? (I. e. due to placebo effects, the passage of time, a regression toward the mean, etc.)

- Does the person conclude that there is a causal relationship based on correlational data?

- Does the person attempt to generalize findings to a larger group based on an unrepresentative or biased sample?

- Did the person ask participants questions in a biased way (e.g., leading their responses, using emotionally charged or confusing phrases or words)?

- Did the person make it impossible to identify his or her theory or hypothesis as false? Does the person consider positive evidence as supporting the theory and negative evidence as irrelevant? Does the person claim that the phenomenon disappears when you try to test it?

- Does the person claim to have found the cause of a behavior or phenomenon? Most complex behaviors or phenomena have several causes.

- Who benefits from the argument made?

- Does the argument suffer from prejudicial biased thinking (internal or other)?

Reference no: EM133281056

Questions Cloud

How can a social worker apply self-awareness : How can a social worker apply self-awareness and self-regulation to manage the influence of personal biases and values in working with diverse clients.

Distinguish between encoding and retrieval processes : Distinguish between encoding and retrieval processes. More specifically, what is the role of each? How can educators improve these processes in their learners?

How does an understanding of proper expression of attraction : How does an understanding of the proper expression of attraction, love and commitment help and guide you as an adolescent become more responsible.

Difference between discipline and classroom management : What is the difference between discipline and classroom management? What is the least important factor that contributes to student learning?

Evaluating the research communication attempt : Below is a framework to use in evaluating the research communication attempt, review your information.

How to structure a counseling session using 5 stages : In this class, you learned how to structure a counseling session using 5 stages.

Research the component of social psychology : The scientific study of social attitudes and behavioris an important component of social psychology.

What emotional changes occur during early childhood : What emotional changes occur during early childhood? Include the roles of playmates and social play in your response.

How psychological principles affect personal : Demonstrate an understanding of how psychological principles affect personal and professional activities.

User Account

All Pages