please make it according to sample which was attached.and used peer review between 2014 to 2018. please make ppt very attractive and used the picture also in ppt. make it attractive and follow the given sample Please add how to collect data in the Method of article 1.You clearly write how to collect data in Method of article 2 Method of article 1.I would like to Thanks that expert who made this assignment solution because I got 24 out of 30. I will give you another assignment very soon.

my presentation is week 10 :- Motivation, rewards and compensation . Please make a presentation according to given ppt. which is also attached. make a presentation very attractive and used the pictures in the ppt. and used the peer review reference between 2014 - 2018

Conclusion (10%) No conclusions provided. Brief conclusion but no links established to the introduction and body of the presentation. Brief conclusion with limited links established to the introduction and body of the presentation. The conclusion provided some links to the introduction and body of the presentation, but was not concise or unclear. The conclusion provided links to the introduction and body of the presentation, but was not concise or unclear at times. Clear and concise summary of the presentation with links to the introduction and body of the presentation. Clear and concise summary with effective links to the introduction and body of the presentation. Visual Aids (20%) No visual aids are used. The visual aids are poorly designed or unrelated to the message presented.

Presentation Delivery (30%) No ability to present. Ideas on the HRM topic is disorganized and not coherent. Pace is highly inappropriate. The student's voice is: not clear; not expressive and/or the student pronounces a number of terms incorrectly. Ideas on the HRM topic is unclear and not in a logical way. Pace is inappropriate. The student's voice is: not clear at times; not expressive and/or the student pronounces occasionally some terms incorrectly. Ideas on the HRM topic are satisfactorily organised with clarity in parts, pacing adequate, though may be over-or under length. The student’s voice is clear and expressive at times during the presentation. Ideas on the HRM topic are presented in an organised way, though lack clarity in parts, adequately paced. The student’s voice is clear and expressive for most of the presentation. Ideas on the HRM topic are presented effectively and expressed in an organised way, appropriately paced. The student has a clear voice, and expressive during the presentation.

Knowledge of Content (30%) No knowledge nor understanding of the HRM topic. Inaccurate knowledge of the HRM topic. Irrelevant information presented. Poor understanding of information and concepts presented. Insufficient knowledge of the HRM topic. Information appears to be randomly chosen and not related to material covered in the unit. Limited understanding of information and concepts presented. Demonstrates satisfactory knowledge of the HRM topic. Information from existing thinking in HRM presented and explained. Satisfactory understanding of information and concepts presented. Demonstrates above average knowledge of the HRM topic. Relevant information presented from latest thinking research in HRM. Above average understanding of information and concepts presented. Demonstrates good knowledge of the HRM topic with insight and depth. Accurate, interesting, and relevant information presented from latest thinking research in HRM. Well-developed understanding of Information and concepts presented.

Key Criteria 0 (Not Shown) 2 (Poor) 3 (Unsatisfactory) 4 (Satisfactory) 5 (Good) 6 (Very Good) 7 (Excellent) Introduction (10%) No introduction. No topic, key points and/or purpose is introduced or the introduction is irrelevant to assessment item. Topic introduced, but the introduction is underdeveloped in terms of key points and/or purpose of presentation. Topic, key points and purpose of the presentation is introduced with satisfactory clarity. Topic, key points and purpose of the presentation is introduced in a clear and interesting way. Topic, key points and purpose of the presentation is introduced in a clear and interesting way which captures the audience's attention. Topic, key points and purpose of the presentation is introduced in an exceptional and interesting way which effectively captures the audience's attention.

While there is no set rule for what your similarity index should be, you should aim for a similarity score that is less than 20%. It is possible that you could have a higher level if you have a very long reference list though. The main thing to look out for is WHERE the similarity is being shown. If there is a high level of similarity found in the body of the assessment, you will probably lose marks for not presenting your own ideas. A high level of similarity in the body of your assessment may significantly affect your marks for each of the criteria, as marks are given based on original text and appropriately referenced text only. It is suggested that you reduce the use of direct quotes from other sources wherever possible.