Reference no: EM132260836

The Scenario Marcus Thomas LLC created preliminary advertising based on the brand promise it recommended to Akron Children’s Hospital:Akron Children’s Hospital focuses All of the hospital’s resources(energy, creativity, state-of-the-art technology, compassion, technical skill, competence, etc.) toward the simple goal of helping every child reach his or her full potential. Within the first quarter, Marcus Thomas reconvened to evaluate the preliminary advertising and refine the brand message. Research on competitors’ messages revealed that the Cleveland Clinic and Rainbow Babies & Children’s Hospital were emphasizing the high-tech nature of their medical practice as a means of defining their quality. Since Akron Children’s faced this competitive counter punch, Marcus Thomas decided to test whether the care-centered brand message they recommended was truly effective in influencing parents’ hospital selection. To test message performance, Marcus Thomas conducted two more rounds of research: focus groups (phase two) followed by surveys (phase three). Focus Groups For phase two, Marcus Thomas organized 120-minute focus groups in three markets,convening participants from Mahoning Valley, Medina, northern Summit, and Portage Counties. (Akron Children’s is located in Summit County; the other counties were targets for business growth.) All participants were parents of children between one month and 18 years of age. All parents had experienced an acute care incident requiring a hospital stay by their child of at least three consecutive days. Half were admitted to one of the following services: cardiology or cardiac surgery, hematology or oncology, neurology or neurosurgery, pulmonary or asthma, or orthopedics ororthopedic surgery. In all, 25 parents participated in one of the three studies. Most were females between 25 and 54 years of age. Medina, Summit, and Portage Counties participants had household incomes between $50,000 and $100,000; Mahoning county participants had household incomes less than $35,000. Each participant was paid a $75 cash incentive. Researchers sought to learn parents’ perceptions of hospitals that conduct medical research, and they wanted to understand the physician and hospital selection process for parents of adolescents (12 to18 years of age). Focus group participants discussed the hospital selection process, criteria for acute care, and sources of information parents considered most frequently in selecting care providers for a major illness. Telephone Surveys For phase three, 1,000 telephone surveys of health care decision makers were conducted between July 11 and August 2, with a 3.1 percent margin of error (at 95 percent confidence). Of the sample, 154 (15.4 percent) were high-acuity respondents (who had a child in a hospital for three or more nights). Forty-two percent of all participants had experience with Akron Children’s. Most were female, with ages, income, and education across a wide range. Respondents were asked to evaluate Akron Children’s, Cleveland Clinic Children’ s, and Rainbow Babies & Children’s on a range of issues, including awareness (aided and unaided) of children’ s hospitals, awareness and messaging of hospital advertising, hospital preferences for medical specialties, factors influencing hospital selection, preferred hospital reference sources, knowledge of hospital positioning and branding promises, and the means by which parents interpreted quality in medical care. (See instruments). Advertising Creative As an outcome of findings from phase two and phase three research, Marcus Thomas developed three television and radio commercials (see DVD). The actual creative approach takes viewers into the lives of patients at Akron Children’s. To make this real for viewers, Marcus Thomas filmed actual children and the dilemmas faced by their parents and doctors. “These parents were incredibly brave, letting our staff video them at their most traumatic moments,” shared Jennifer Hirt-Marchand, vice president and director, of research at Marcus Thomas. “We captured real patients, undergoing actual surgeries with real physicians. There was no reshooting or posing. It was like a documentary.” Cameras filmed for three weeks, often 12 hours a day, as they followed multiple children and families through acute care. Videographers accompanied parents and children during physician consultations, explanations of medical procedures surgeries, waiting-room vigils, postsurgery reports, chemotherapy, rehabilitative care, and more. These dedicated advertising creative staff, sometimes themselves exhausted from living the trauma with their subjects, would return to Marcus Thomas during breaks to study hours of tape. The footage and resulting commercials (see ads on your text DVD) testify to what researchers hypothesized after their original observation study and confirmed through the focus groups and surveys: that Akron Children’s lives a unique brand promise and that its promise resonates with parents. Akron Children’s experienced an 11 percent increase in market share as a result of this Marcus Thomas–created branding campaign. The firm conducts periodic follow-up telephone surveys to ensure that the ads and brand message continue to influence parents’ hospital selection decision making. Answer the following questions: 1. Develop a focus group discussion guide for the research described in Part A a. What topics should be discussed in what order? b. What pre-tasking exercises might be relevant? c. What exercises might you use during the focus group? 2. Evaluate the use of the telephone as the method for the survey. 3. Evaluate the questionnaire used for the telephone survey. Make sure to discuss scale type, question working, question number topic order, transitions, and interviewer directions. 4. Interviewers screened potential participants for whether they were the health care decision maker in the household and whether children were in the household. Identify other criteria that might have been used for screening and offer reasons for its inclusion or exclusion. 5. Evaluate the sampling decisions: a. Was this an appropriate sample size? b. What parameters might have been used in structuring this sample?