Reference no: EM133204614 , Length: 4000 Words

Part 1
A. Examine the benefits of producing tourism strategic plans for a coastal area and illustrate that with an example of a destination that has benefited from it. (Academic and other sources must be used)
B. Evaluate the importance of Collaborative Planning in tourism and justify why this approach would be useful for Deal coastal area. Discuss the pros and cons of this approach.

Part 2
C. Compile a brief tourism strategy with clear vision and objectives, which will address the current issues and challenges that Deal is facing.
D. Describe how your vision and objectives could be implemented and identify the key stakeholders in charge of delivering those objectives.
E. Evaluate how your strategy is going to benefit the residents and visitors socially and economically.
You can use maps, images, diagrams, tables and other figures to help communicate what you want to say.
Label all figures. The report must be 4,000 words

Introduction:
Clearly outlined the aim and objectives of the report Present briefly the context of the destination (Deal)

Main body
Explain concepts and theories relevant to strategic tourism planning and development of tourism destinations/coastal areas
Justify and evaluate the need for strategic planning and/or various approaches to strategic planning Present particularities of strategic planning for coastal destinations using one relevant example.

Present tourism situational analysis for Deal highlighting the issues and challenges that they are facing Compile a brief tourism strategy for the given destination (Deal) to include: - vision and objectives - solutions to current issues and challenges - stakeholders involved - ways/means to be implemented - possible benefits & results/improvements (in case the strategy is implemented)

Conclusion and Recommendations Provide an appropriate conclusion and substantial recommendations
Quality of analysis and evaluation - Considered the issues/concepts from a number of perspectives and properly compared and contrasted the arguments/viewpoints of different authors - Make use of appropriate writing style - Provide evaluative comments based on literature
References Citations and reference list should be presented in correct Harvard referencing style
The text has a good flow, and the arguments are developed to the level 6 standards.