Reference no: EM13963691
SECTION A
Case Study - Read the case carefully and answer Question.
Alvis Corporation
Kevin McCarthy is the manager of a production department in Alvis Corporation, a firm that manufactures office equipment. After reading an article that stressed the benefits of participative management, Kevin believes that these benefits could be realised in his department if the workers are allowed to participate in making some decisions that affect them. The workers are not unionised. Kevin selected two decisions for his experiment in participative management.
The first decision involved vacation schedules. Each summer, the workers were given two weeks vacation, but no more than two workers can go on vacation at the same time, In prior years, Kevin made this decision himself. He would first ask the workers to indicate their preferred dates,. and he considered how the work would be affected if different people were out at the same time. It was important to plan a vacation schedule that would ensure adequate staffing for all of the essential operations performed by the department. When more then two workers wanted the same time period, and they had similar skills, he usually gave preference to the workers with the highest productivity.
The second decision involved production standards. Sales had been increasing steadily over the past few years, and the company recently installed some new equipment to increase productivity. The new equipment would allow Kevin's department to produce more with the same number of workers. The company had a pay incentive system in which workers received a piece rate for each unit produced above a standard amount. Separate standards existed for each type of product, based on an industrial engineering study conducted a few years earlier. Top management wanted to readjust the production standards to reflect the fact that the new equipment made it possible for the workers to earn more without working any harder. The savings from higher productivity were needed to help pay the new equipment.
Kevin called a meeting of his 15 workers an hour before the end of the workday. He explained that he wanted them to discuss the two issues and make recommendations. Kevin figured that the workers might be inhibited about participating in the discussion if he were present, so he left them alone to discuss the issues. Besides, Kevin had an appointment to meet with the quality control manager. Quality problems had increased after the new equipment was installed, and the industrial engineers were studying the problem in an attempt to determine why quality had gotten worse rather than better.
When Kevin returned to his department just at quitting time, he was surprised to learn that the workers recommended keeping the standards the same. He had assumed they knew the pay incentives were no longer fair and would set a higher standard. The spokesman for the group explained that their base pay had not kept up with inflation and the higher incentive pay restored their real income to its prior level.
On the vacation issue, the group was deadlocked. Several of the workers wanted to take their vacations during the same two-week period and could not agree on who should go. Some workers argued that they should have priority because they had more seniority, while others argued that priority should be based on productivity, as in the past. Since it was quitting time, the group concluded that Kevin would have to resolve the dispute himself. After all, wasn't that what he was being paid for?
Question 1
a) Analyse the situation using the Hersey-Blanchard Situational Leadership Model. What does this model suggest as the appropriate leadership on decision style? Explain.
b) Evaluate Kevin McCarthy's leadership style before and during his experiment in participative management.
c) If you were Kevin McCarthy, what would you do now?
SECTION B
Question 2
a) Discuss with relevant examples transactional leadership, strategic leadership, and transformational leadership respectively.
b) Select one company from the following list of organisations: a medical specialist centre, a five-star hotel, a commercial bank, and an information technology and network company. If you were the general manager of the selected corn pangs which type of leadership would you practise in your organisation? Give reasons to support your answer.
Question 3
a) Now is employee empowerment related to Maslow Hierarchy of Needs Theory? If you were the head of a marketing and trading company, how would you apply Maslow Hierarchy of Needs Theory to motivate your staff towards higher productivity and greater performance?
b) What are task-specialist behaviour and socio-emotional behaviour as two important roles played by a team leader? Relate these two roles to leader communication and management communication championed by a leader in the context of organisational and interpersonal communication.
Question 4
a) Problem-solving and decision-making is a critical managerial function. To what extent are rational thinking and creative thinking applied respectively in the key stages of problem-solving and decision-making process?
b) In a problem-solving and decision-making process, opinions as to how a solution is selected may differ and result in a conflict. However, if the conflict were managed effectively, it could become a positive force in an organisation. Discuss four positive outcomes that may emerge from a conflict effectively resolved.
Question 5
a) In the context of a chaotic global environment of rapid changes, discuss four leadership dilemma that need to be addressed in the 21st century.
b) Organisational change is inevitable in the rapidly changing global environment. Discuss four strategies that can be deployed to implement organisational change effectively.