Instructions: I am doing International Business Management 3rd year and the module is about Debating Globalization. The reference style is Harvard and language to be used is British English. The word count is 2,500 words (excluding references) I have attached a copy of the assignment. These are some tips of the structure - Introduction: Introduce the main question. Explain your plan/structure of your work following sub-questions. Main body: Address the sub-questions. Remember other important conditions to meet to address the questions such as theory application or data analysis. Conclusion: Make conclusion about your analysis of the sub-questions. This should address the main question if you have done the main analysis correctly.

Assessment limits - Not exceeding 2,500 words, excluding bibliography and appendices. In cases, where this word limit is exceeded, only first 2,500 words will be marked. Late submissions will not be accepted without approved extenuating circumstances, and will be treated as non-submissions, requiring re-sit. Assessment Criteria (The actual assessment components for this assignment) - Understanding key ideas of the development of US hegemony such as neo-liberalism, International financial institutions. Determining changes in international trade and investment including US policy changes. Critically analysing how these changes in US policies and international trade and investment affect US hegemony. Structure and presentation of material including clarity and academic style of writing. Appropriateness and use of relevant and current literature including academic journal articles and thoroughness of referencing with use of Harvard referencing system.

Your module guide and course handbook contain additional and important information regarding; The required referencing style for your assignment. Whilst many modules require referencing in accordance with the Harvard Referencing convention, some modules – for example those within the School of Law – require Oxford Referencing. Please familiarise yourself with the requirements of your module. Submission of your work - Marking, feedback and moderation in accordance with the University of Wolverhampton Assessment Handbook. Extensions on submission dates. Additional support and Links to appropriate sources of relevant information.

When you submit your work you will be required to sign an important declaration confirming that: The submission is your own work. Any material you have used has been acknowledged and appropriately referenced. You have not allowed another student to have access to your work. The work has not been submitted previously. The following information is important when: Preparing for your assignment - Checking your work before you submit it, Interpreting feedback on your work after marking.

Very detailed answers to all parts of the question / task. Extremely clearly structured and focused, demonstrating overall coherence and in- depth understanding. Clear evidence of a range of independently sourced material well applied in all contexts. No obvious errors in grammar as appropriate. Focused and comprehensive engagement with the question, showing evidence of in-depth understanding of the issues. Extremely clearly structured and demonstrating a coherent argument throughout. Evidence of wide, independent reading. No obvious errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate.

Exceptionally detailed and original response to the assignment, with critical use of independently sourced contextual material.?Outstanding demonstration of linked understanding of relevant theory, concepts and models. Extremely well structured with high level of analysis. No obvious errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate. Exceptional level of analysis, showing deep critical engagement with a comprehensive range of contextual material. Demonstration of independent thought resulting in highly original or creative responses to the assignment. Provision of clear evidence of understanding of current scholarship and research based on an extensive range of relevant sources. Extreme clarity of structure demonstrating complete focus of argument. No obvious errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate.