Reference no: EM1379061

Allow me to preface my personal remarks through stating which i haven't browse the post that you simply mentioned previously. While there is not really a hyperlink supplied We ca not confirm when the statements a person help to make concerning "formula companies" bribing healthcare companies, tend to be accurate or even not really. With regards to this particular composition I'll presume how the statements you earn inside your very first section tend to be precise.

Infant formula cannot be held responsible for the misuse of their products. It would be impossible for any company to foresee all the ways that the product they make might be misused. Can companies that sell aerosol sprays and/or glue be held responsible for the fact that some kids get high on their products? If a glass beer bottle is used in a bar fight as a weapon can we hold the bottle manufacturer responsible? No company can be held responsible for the inappropriate use of the product they make. Having said that, you have made the additional charge that formula companies bribe health care providers with supplies they need for their hospitals. Of course I haven't seen the article but the truth is it may or may not be a bribe. Do soft drink companies "bribe" schools to put soda dispensers in their schools or do they just make a business arrangement with them. Does Coca-Cola bribe certain restaurants to serve their drinks rather than those belonging to Pepsi? I would imagine that formula companies should have the right to try to sell their products to as many people as necessary. Calling a business transaction a bribe is misleading unless they are indeed circumventing the law and doing something illegal.