Ethan nadelmann advance for legalization of drugs

Reference no: EM133648577

Question

What argument does drug expert Ethan Nadelmann advance for the legalization of drugs? Legalization will increase the price of drugs, making it too expensive for people to use them. The use of mood-altering substances is customary in nearly all human societies. If mood-altering drugs were legal, young people would be less likely to use them since they are no longer forbidden. The government taxes on drugs would help pay for drug prevention, drug treatment, and other social programs.

Reference no: EM133648577

Questions Cloud

Explain how one reason relates to xendit : Explain how one reason relates to Xendit, another reason relates to right up the middle and the third reason can relate to any reading.

Explanation of the term reflective practice : Explanation of the term reflective practice in the reflective practice can mean different things to ECEs

Limitations you found during our article matching activity : What was your reaction to the research study design limitations discussed in class and the limitations you found during our article matching activity?

Thinking about social psychology : Do you ever try to persuade friends or family members to do something? How do you try to persuade them? How do they try to persuade you?

Ethan nadelmann advance for legalization of drugs : What argument does drug expert Ethan Nadelmann advance for the legalization of drugs?

Transition between homosexual and heterosexual : What is known about female bisexuality? It is usually stable over many years. It occurs only during a transition between homosexual and heterosexual.

Worldviews paint nuanced picture of human understanding : In essence, the strengths and weaknesses of these contrasting worldviews paint a nuanced picture of human understanding.

People with no history of depression : Recurrences of depression might occur because people who have experienced episodes of MDD think differently than people with no history of depression

Contrast to psychology as pathology : What three ideas do they present in contrast to 'psychology as pathology'? What are the implications of their ideas for social policy and/or your life?

User Account

All Pages