Reference no: EM133638503

While collecting secondary data, we discover that the 10001-zip code has a higher prevalence of chronic illnesses such as hypertension and diabetes compared to other areas in New York City. This information highlights the specific health needs that should be addressed, with a focus on chronic illness management. In terms of community assets, the Neighborhood Navigator data reveal that there are local clinics, community centers, and support groups in the 10001-zip code. These can be used to complement the program's efforts in addressing Ms. Thomas's health needs and the broader community's health concerns.

Once the data has been collected, the next step is to identify program priorities. A priority matrix is a valuable tool for this purpose. The matrix assesses factors based on their importance and changeability. Importance refers to how significant a factor is in influencing the health needs of Ms. Thomas and the community. Changeability evaluates whether the factor can be modified or improved through the program's intervention. Factors that are both important and changeable are high-priority areas for the program. The priority matrix provides a visual representation of these factors, helping to identify where resources and efforts should be focused. In the context of Ms. Thomas and the 10001-zip code, managing chronic illnesses, improving access to healthcare services, and promoting lifestyle changes are high-priority areas. These issues are both important and modifiable, making them ideal for intervention. For instance, when constructing the priority matrix, the data may reveal that managing chronic illnesses is both highly important and changeable within the community. This is evident from the prevalence of chronic illnesses and the availability of local resources that can support chronic illness management. Therefore, this factor is identified as a high-priority area for the program.

With the program's priorities established, the next step is to develop clear and achievable goals and objectives. Goals are broad statements that define the program's overall purpose, while objectives are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) targets that help in achieving the goals. Our main goal is enhancing the overall health and well-being of Ms. Thomas and the community in the 10001-zip code area. And our objective is to Increase Ms. Thomas's adherence to her prescribed medical treatments by 20% within one year. Establish a monthly community health workshop series on chronic illness management for at least 50 community members within six months.Improve access to healthcare services by connecting 70% of eligible individuals in the community with local clinics and support groups within a year. Encourage healthy lifestyle changes in the community, leading to a 15% reduction in the incidence of chronic illnesses within two years. These objectives are designed to be specific and measurable, ensuring that the program's impact can be quantified and evaluated effectively. For example, the first objective focuses on improving Ms. Thomas's adherence to her prescribed medical treatments, a crucial aspect of managing chronic illnesses. The 20% increase within one year is a specific and measurable target.

To achieve the established goals and objectives, a range of program intervention activities must be designed. These activities can include workshops, educational sessions, community outreach, and policy recommendations. The choice of these activities should be theory-driven, meaning that they are based on established health behavior theories. The Health Belief Model, for instance, emphasizes the importance of individual beliefs, perceived barriers, and benefits in managing chronic illnesses effectively. Using such theories helps in designing activities that are more likely to result in positive behavior change. Conduct regular one-on-one health education sessions with Ms. Thomas: These sessions will focus on building her understanding of her condition, explaining the importance of treatment adherence, and addressing any perceived barriers to adherence. This aligns with the Health Belief Model, which emphasizes the role of perceived barriers and benefits in influencing behavior.

Organize monthly health workshops, The workshops will cover topics such as medication management, nutrition, and exercise. These workshops are theory-driven, aiming to influence individual beliefs about the benefits of healthy lifestyle choices and how to overcome barriers. Collaborate with local clinics and support groups: This intervention activity leverages community assets by connecting individuals with the existing resources. It ensures that the community can access healthcare services, making it a practical and sustainable approach. Another example is to Promote lifestyle changes. Activities such as cooking classes and fitness events aim to make healthy living more appealing and feasible for the community. By addressing perceived barriers and emphasizing benefits, these activities are theory-driven in their approach. To ensure the program's effectiveness, a robust evaluation plan is necessary. The evaluation plan should encompass various aspects, including assessing the quality and impact of the program on Ms. The next example is the Thomas and the community. By Evaluating it can involve several components, such as Periodic assessments of Ms. Thomas's health progress: This includes measurements of adherence to medical treatments and lifestyle changes. These assessments should be conducted at regular intervals to track her improvement over time. Monthly workshops attendance records and participant feedback: Monitoring the number of participants and collecting feedback from workshop attendees will help assess the community's engagement with the program. The last example is tracking the number of community members accessing local clinics and support groups, this is a tangible measure of the program's success in improving access to healthcare services within the community. the evaluation of Ms. Thomas's progress, her adherence to prescribed medical treatments can be measured through pharmacy records or self-reported data. Regular assessments will provide insights into whether the program is effectively improving her health outcomes.

Lastly The program budget is a critical component, and it is important that it does not exceed $20,000. The allocation of funds should be justified by the expected impact of the program on Ms. Thomas and the community. The budget should cover various expenses, including staff salaries, educational materials, workshop expenses, and community outreach initiatives. The justification lies in the potential for the program to enhance the health and well-being of Ms. Thomas and the community, thus leading to long-term cost savings on healthcare expenses and improved quality of life.

In conclusion, the program designed for Ms. Ann Thomas in the 10001- zip code area of New York City is a comprehensive approach to addressing her primary health need and broader community health concerns. It leverages available assets, focuses on modifiable priorities, and uses health behavior theories to design intervention activities. The proposed evaluation plan ensures that the program's quality and effectiveness are continually assessed. The budget allocation is justified by the expected positive impact on the health and well-being of Ms. Thomas and her community. Through this program, the goal is to improve health outcomes and quality of life for Ms. Thomas and her community, ultimately contributing to a healthier and more vibrant community.

Question 1.

Discuss a program evaluation. a critical skill, especially in fields like public health and community health. Below you will find instructions for writing a program evaluation and an example of the main components you should include in your evaluation plan.

steps on creating a program evaluation.

step1 Understand the Program: Before beginning the evaluation, you must have a clear understanding of the program's goals, objectives, priorities, target population, and activities.

step 2. Define the Purpose of the Evaluation: Clarify whether the evaluation is to assess the program's effectiveness, efficiency, impact, or to inform future program development. This will guide the evaluation design.

step 3. Develop Evaluation Questions: These questions should be specific, measurable, and aligned with the program's goals. For example, "Did the program increase awareness about public health among participants?"

step4. Choose an Evaluation Design: Decide on a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method approach. Quantitative methods might include surveys or data analysis, while qualitative methods could involve interviews or focus groups.

step 5. Collect Data: Decide how you will gather data that answers the evaluation questions. This could involve administering surveys, conducting interviews, observing program activities, or collecting and analyzing program records.

Question 2

Make a budget plan regarding the plan above. make sure it doesn't exceed 20,000. make sure it has each plan in it have examples per part. for example yoga mats.