Eligibility in union elections

Reference no: EM1341502

In a 1977 decision involving the United Steelworkers of America, the U.S. Supreme Court by a split vote upset a union rule requiring candidates for local union office to have attended at least one-half of a local's union regular meetings for the 3 years preceding the election. Under the union's rule, 96.5 percent of the members of the local were disqualified from union office. In its decision, the high court stressed that national labor legislation (and specifically the Landrum-Griffin Act of 1959) was designed to promote union democracy without interfering unduly with union internal affairs. It said:

Applying these principles to the case, we conclude that the anti-democratic effects of the meeting attendance rule outweighs the interests urged in its support An attendance requirement that that results in the exclusion of 96.5 percent of the members from candidacy for union office hardly seems to be a reasonable qualification" (as required by Landrum-Griffin) consistent with the goal of free and democratic elections. A requirement having that result obviously severely restricts the free choice of the membership in selecting their leaders.

The minority of the court believed the attendance rule to be a reasonable qualification. It criticized the majority for using a statistical test. The rule was reasonable, it said, because it could encourage attendance at meetings, guarantee that candidates for office had a meaningful interest in the union, and assure that the candidates had a chance to become informed about union affairs.

Do you agree with the majority or the minority here and in either case, why?

Reference no: EM1341502

Questions Cloud

Important information about fair labor standards act : These teenagers are employed throughout the company and are paid at an hourly wage rate of $3 per hour. Discuss the legality of this arrangement.

Direct labor savings and labor cost avoidance savings : What is the difference between direct labor savings and labor cost avoidance savings from a managerial perspective?

Alternative procedures for considering internal employees : What are the alternative procedures for considering internal employees and What are the advantages and disadvantages for each?

Labor relations : American unionism has very definitely been a war profiteer and Do you agree or disagree

Eligibility in union elections : Do you agree with the majority or the minority here and in either case, why

Labor unions : Need to address the following statement in my presentation "Management should always fight hard to keep unions out of their organizations

Mobile robot control and potential field : Write a MATLAB code to compute forces due to each obstacle and goal. Compute total force on vehicle at point(x,y).

Management vs union contract negotiations : You are a supervisor in a small manufacturing plant. The union contract covering most of your employees is about to expire and How do you prepare for union contract negotiations?

Organizations norms are rigid or unfair : Must group norms conform to the organization's norms, and can the leadership of the organization minimize or change a group's norms

User Account

All Pages