Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
In 1991, EnerSys entered into an agreement with Exide Technologies to purchase substantially all of Exide's battery business for about $135 million. To formalize this sale, the parties entered into more than 23 agreements. Under the collection of agreements, Exide agreed to allow EnerSys to use the Exide trademark without royalties in the industrial battery business, and Exide retained the right to use the Exide trademark outside the industrial battery business. In 2000, Exide wished to reenter the North American industrial battery business. Both parties agreed to the termination of the 10-year noncompetition agreement, but Exide was unable to regain the Exide trademark from EnerSys. In 2002, when Exide filed for bankruptcy protection, Exide attempted to reject various agreements it had made with EnerSys in 1991, including the right to use Exide's trademark. The bankruptcy court granted an order finding that the agreement was an executory contract, a contract that was so underperformed that failure of either party to complete performance would result in a material breach excusing performance of the other. The Bankruptcy Code allows debtors to reject any executor contract. EnerSys appealed the bankruptcy court's decision, arguing that it had substantially performed its obligations under the 1991 agreement, including paying the full $135 million and operating the industrial battery business the 11 years prior to the 2002 bankruptcy ruling. The district court affirmed the bankruptcy court's holding that EnerSys's obligation for trademark use and quality standards provision amounted to elements of the agreement that would cause a material breach if they were not observed. EnerSys again appealed, arguing that any obligations EnerSys had under the 1991 agreement were not material. How do you think the court of appeals ruled? What standard would you use to determine whether an element of the agreement between the two parties was material? [In re Exide Techs., 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 11029.]
Corporate Social Responsibility In this assignment please read the article by Popa & Salanta. You are also asked to do some additional research on Corporate Social Responsibility.
Define each chosen business formation. Explain at least three pros and three cons for each potential business formation
In a limited partnership, when it is wound up and the assets are distributed, how does a limited partner (lets say Charles) who is also a creditor receive his assets back? Lets say he had contributed
What is the difference between the grand jury system and a preliminary hearing?
Dartmouth College v. Woodward (17 U. S. 518, 1819). The Issue- Under the Constitution, can a state legislature change the charter of a college
John is aware that the structure of his organization must change in order to compete more effectively in today's global market. However, he is not sure which structure would work best for his company. His company is currently organized around account..
Demonstrate a working knowledge and understanding of the principles of Australian company law within the context of the prescribed readings.
While the others were reluctant, Paul climbed over the fence and walked to the edge of the cliff. He lost his balance and fell off the cliff and broke his leg. Paul wishes to sue the Willow Council who is responsible for Lookout Point. Advise Paul..
The plaintiff, who had 30 years of loss control experience, applied for the job but was not interviewed. ICNA hired a 28-year-old woman with no loss control.
You will write a report in which you present your recommendations to the president. Consult your textbook index for a list of crime types. Think about the information on the different crimes and select one crime that you believe is the most diffic..
Provide an oral advice on the law to the client in the form of a YouTube video, weighing up the alternatives and providing a recommendation.
1. david gives ethel power of attorney. david then has a nervous breakdown and becomes insane. ethel has the
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +1-415-670-9521
Phone: +1-415-670-9521
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd