I will always prefer to involve ExpertsMind for writing my assignments because they are reliable and never discards revisions. They do reply, sometimes it happened that I misunderstood the things but when I crosschecked with my professor I could understand that the expert was right. thanks

Graphs for some sections especially the GDP are necessary. I want all the topics - Economic factors,trade and investment environment(FDI) and Foreign exchange issues for pakistan's Higher education that is university Level sector. explain about how higher education influences those three topics. it shows how each topic is affected by the Higher education sector. Here it is.

6.5 Report includes all elements and is generally presented appropriately. Writing mostly flows well and sections are linked. Referencing is in accordance with guidelines. English is used effectively with few errors present. 6.0-6.9 7.5 Report includes all elements and is well presented. Writing flows clearly and sections are linked effectively. Referencing is of a high standard. English is used effectively with very few errors present. 7-7.9 10 Report includes all elements and is very well presented. Writing flows clearly and sections are linked very effectively. Referencing is exemplary. English is used very effectively and is error-free. 8-10 C 60-69 D 70-79 HD 80-100

Presentation and Writing Total: 10 Marks GLO1 1.5 Report is lacking key elements and is poorly presented. Writing did not flow clearly leaving the paper to seem disjointed. Referencing is not in accordance with relevant guidelines. Basic English is used with errors present. 0-2.9 4 Report lacked some elements and is poorly presented. Writing often did not flow clearly leaving the paper to seem somewhat disjointed. Referencing is not entirely in accordance with relevant guidelines. Basic English is used with errors present. 3.0-4.9 5.5 Report includes most elements and is adequately presented. Writing sometimes did not flow clearly leaving the paper to seem disjointed in areas. Referencing adequately met the guidelines. English is used to an adequate level. 5.0-5.9 Overall Total: 100 Marks N 0-29 N 30-49 P 50-59

6.5 Provides a good summary of issues and findings. Rationale for the decisions made throughout the report is generally effectively reinforced in this section; recommendations and final concluding statements are of a reasonable standard. 6.0-6.9 7.5 Provides a clear and concise summary of issues and findings. Rationale for the decisions made throughout the report is effectively reinforced in this section; recommendations and final concluding statements are of a high standard. 7-7.9 10 Provides a very clear and concise summary of issues and findings. Rationale for the decisions made throughout the report is effectively reinforced in this section; recommendations and final concluding statements are exemplary. 8-10

Conclusion Summarise key elements of the report and reinforce rationale for recommendations made. Total: 10 Marks GLO1 1.5 Provides very little summary of the issues and findingsof the report. Rationale for the decisions made throughout the reportare not reinforced in this section; recommendations and final concluding statements are absent. 0-2.9 4 Provides a very basic summary of issues and findings. Rationale for the decisions made throughout the report are not reinforced in this section; recommendations and final concluding statements are poor. 3.0-4.9 5.5 Provides an adequate summary of issues and findings. Rationale for decisions made throughout the report are somewhat reinforced in this section; recommendations and final concluding statements are adequate. 5.0-5.9

13 Uses a good quality and variety of sources, including journal articles, textbooks, business database sources, professional reports, internet and media which is used to support discussion. 12-13.9 15 Uses a very good quality and variety of sources, including journal articles, textbooks, business databases, , professional reports, internet and media which is used effectively to support discussion. 14-15.9 20 Uses an excellent quality and variety of sources, including journal articles, textbooks, business databases, professional reports, internet, mediaand used effectively to support discussion. 16-20

Research Quality and Analysis Include research from a range of sources (minimum requirement of at least 10 industry reports) and use this to support discussion and inform recommended action. Total: 20 marks GLO4 0 Uses a very poor quality and variety of sources. Not all relevant sources of information are used, and there is a reliance on one type of source, and these are not used effectively to support discussion. 0-5.9 8 Uses a poor quality and variety of sources. Not all relevant sources of information are used, and there is a reliance on one type of source and these are rarely used to support discussion effectively. 6-9.9 11 Uses an acceptable quality and variety of sources, including journal articles, textbooks, business databases, professional reports, internet and media which is used to a satisfactory level to support discussion. 10-11.9

26 Displays a good understanding of key concepts/theory, the application of those concepts to the country analysed, including a forecast of that information and from the perspective of the case organisation. Good arguments are made in regard to the data. 24-27.9 30 Displays a very good understanding of key concepts/theory, the application of those concepts to the country analysed, including a forecast of that information and from the perspective of the case organisation. Very good arguments are made in regard to the data. 28-31.9 40 Displays an excellent understanding of key concepts/theory, the application of those concepts to the country analysed, including a forecast of that information and from the perspective of the case organisation. Excellent arguments are made in regard to the data. 32-40 marks

Content & reasoning (economic, politics, legal, trade, FDI, foreign exchange, finance and cultural sections) Total: 40 marks GLO1 and GL08 6 Displays no/very little understanding of key concepts/theory, the application of those to the country analysed, including a forecast of that information and from the perspective of the case organisation. Little/few arguments are made in regard to the data. 0-11.9 16 Displays an inconsistent understanding of key concepts/theory, the application of those concepts to the country analysed, including a forecast of that information and from the perspective of the case organisation. Poor arguments are made in regard to the data. 12-19.9 22 Displays a satisfactory understanding of key concepts/theory, the application of those concepts to the country analysed, including a forecast of that information and from the perspective of the case organisation. Satisfactory arguments are made in regard to the data. 20-23.9

6.5 Provides a good company background, articulates the scope of the report and the research methodologies used to a good standard and comments on the quality of data used. 6.0-6.9 7.5 Provides a very good company background, clearly articulates the scope of the report and the research methodologies used to a very good standard and comments on the quality of data used. 7-7.9 10 Provides an excellent company background, very clearly articulates the scope of the report and the research methodologies used to an excellent standard and critically analyses the quality of data used. 8-10

Background/Introduction Describe the issues to be addressed, gives a company background, presents the research methodologies, and critically analyses the quality of data Total: 10 marks GLO1 1.5 Provides a very minimal company background, very poorly articulates the scope of the report and the research methodologies and does not critically analyse the quality of data collected. 0-2.9 4 Provides minimal company background, poorly articulates the scope of the report and the research methodologies used, and does little to critically analyse the quality of data collected. 3.0-4.9 5.5 Provides an acceptable company background, articulates the scope of the report and the research methodologies used to an acceptable standard and comments on the quality of data used. 5.0-5.9

Good Very good Excellent 6.5 Provides a good summary of the report which included key information and findings in the report. Further enhancementis needed by more concisely highlighting key issues and findings. 6.0-6.9 7.5 Provides a very detailed but succinct summary which provides the reader with a clear overview of the report. Most of the findings are presented. 7-7.9 10 Provides an excellent executive summary which delivers all relevant information necessary to guide the reader through the remainder of the report. 8-10

MPM735 – International Business Management Assignment 1, Individual Country Report Scored out of 100% = 30% for the total unit Criteria Poor Needs improvement Satisfactory Good Very good Excellent Scope of report/Key Findings (Executive Summary) Provide a concise overview of the main points discussed in your report Total: 10marks GLO1 1.5 Provides a poor/weak overview/summary of key aspects of the report. Displays little/no understanding of what an executive summary should contain; no findings provided. 0-2.9 4 Provides a brief summary which only touched on key aspects of the report. Generally this section reads more like an introduction than an executive summary. Displays an incomplete understanding of what an executive summary should contain; very few findings provided. 3.0-4.9 5.5 Provides an adequate summary of the report which could have been further developed with additional details drawn from the report.

Hello Even though I'm attaching all the details of the assignment ,I just need help about the country Pakistan's Economic factors,trade and investment environment(FDI) and Foreign exchange issues in the Higher educational field which is university level. The points that should be covered under those three topics were mentioned in the files clearly. The word count should be 800 Graphs and necessary diagrams can be helpful.