Reference no: EM132694256
ECON8015 Topics in Applied Econometrics - Macquarie University
Part I
Acemoglu et al. (2005) investigate whether education promotes democracy. Arguments in the literature are based on the assumption that education broadens one's outlook and increases the ability to make rational electoral choices.
In this study you will use two measures of democracy. The first one is the Freedom House Political Rights Index (FHP). This index is based on the political rights for individuals in a country (free and fair elections, whether those who are elected rule, whether there are competitive parties or other political groupings, whether the opposition plays an important role and has actual power, and whether minority groups have reasonable self-government or can participate in the government through informal consensus). It is transformed to lie between 0 and 1. The value 1 corresponds to the most democratic set of institutions. The second index is the Polity IV (Polity4) index. The Polity Democracy Index ranges from zero to ten and is derived from coding the competitiveness of political participation, the openness and competitiveness of executive recruitment, and constraints on the chief executive. To facilitate comparison with the Freedom House score, we normalize the composite Polity index to lie between zero and one.
You are also given the countries PPP GDP per capita in log (lrgdp) and education as average total years of schooling in the population age 25 years and over (educ).
The data file DEMO_8015.xlsx includes data on 60 countries for the sample period 1960- 2000 and each observation corresponds to five-year intervals.
We consider the following econometric model:
dit = β1i + yt + β2di,t -1 + β3educit + eit
(1) where dit is the democracy score of country i in period t.
1. Graph the two democracy series on different graphs using the individual cross sectional unit option. Comment on the graphs.
2. Using FHP as the democracy index estimate equation (1) using FE (both cross-sections and periods) and 2SLS (use the following instruments educ(-1 to -2) and lrgdp(-1 to -2) @EXPAND(@YEAR,@DROPFIRST) C for 2SLS).
Comment on the results.
3. Estimate equation (1) using FHP as the democracy index and Arellano-Bond. Use the following instruments: @DYN(FHP,-2) @DYN(EDUC, -2) @DYN(LRGDP,-2) @LEV(@EXPAND(@YEAR,@DROPFIRST)).
Comment on the results.
4. Estimate equation (1) using Polity4 as the democracy index and Arellano-Bond. Use the following instruments: @DYN(Polity4,-2) @DYN(EDUC,-2) @DYN(LRGDP,-2) @LEV((@(EXPAND(@YEAR,@DROPFIRST)).
Comment on the results.
Part II
Long run relationship between energy consumption and GDP
Basic Concepts
In this assignment you will investigate the long run relationship between energy consumption and GDP in Asia over the last four decades. Twenty Asian countries including Australia, Bangladesh, People's Republic of China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Nepal, New Zealand, Pakistan, Singapore, Chinese Taipei, Thailand, Vietnam, Philippines, Myanmar, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Brunei Darussalam have been selected. These Asian economies represent a dynamic, diverse, and interesting set of countries and exhibit a wide range of growth patterns in both energy consumption and the GDPs produced.
Over the past several decades we have observed significant changes in energy consumption and income (GDP) characteristics of these 20 Asian countries. Individual country changes have not occurred in a vacuum. These changes have occurred within the context of changing regional and world energy consumption patterns.
You are asked to apply panel unit roots and panel cointegration techniques to study the relationships between per capita GDP (GDP-PC) and per capita total final consumption (TFC) of energy. In the cross-section dimension the panel includes the 20 economies across Asia, and in the time series dimension it ranges over the 46-year period from 1971 to 2016. You will need to take the logs of those variables.
The data file is TFC_GDP_8015.xlsx. The annual data are drawn from the IEA and OECD online databases: GDP (billion 2010 USD using PPPs), TFC (mtoe, Million Tonnes of Oil Equivalent), Population (millions).
1. Graph the two series, log(GDP/Population) (LGDPPC) and log(TFC/Population) (LTFCPC) on the same graph using the Individual cross sectional unit option. GDPPC should be on the left axis and TFCPC on the right axis.
Do the series appear to move together? Comment on the relationship between these two variables during the sample period.
2. Test whether the two series are I(1) using panel unit root tests.
3. Test whether those two series are cointegrated using TFCPC as the dependent variable. Use the Pedroni test for cointegration.
4. Whether or not you found cointegration, estimate the cointegrating relationship using Panel DOLS. Comment on the results.
Attachment:- Topics in Applied Econometrics.rar