Reference no: EM133481662

Homework: Malala Yousafzai and Christina Lamb Summary

For this homework, you will write a summary and response paper for one of our first three assigned texts. You must pick a new text!

Your paper will be divided into two primary sections: 1) a rhetorical summary of your selected text, and 2) a response to two of the central rhetorical elements in your selected text.

In your summary section, you will need to create a rhetorical summary of the main rhetorical elements (language, structure, and rhetorical appeals) of your selected text, relying primarily on paraphrasing with minimal quoting, if any. Remember to keep track of your specific information as you will need to include in-text citations for any quotes or specific pieces of information in your paper and then cite your sources on your Works Cited page.

Next, for your response, you will need to select two key rhetorical elements from your selected text and respond to them critically in two separate body paragraphs. You should select elements which reflect the author's rhetorical decision-making, including language, structure, or rhetorical appeals. You should respond by supporting or criticizing their use of these elements with your own ideas and explaining why you're responding the way you are.

Here is the organizational structure for your summary and response paper:

1. An introduction, including:

a. the title and author of the text you will summarize and respond to

b. background information on the topic

c. the author's main argument

d. a thesis that gives your main response to the rhetoric of the text

2. Body paragraph 1 rhetorical summary: A summary of the author's text, including:

a. the author's main argument, original intended audience, and purpose

b. the author's language and structure and their function

c. the author's rhetorical appeals and their function

d. short quotations from the text, if necessary

3. Body paragraphs 2 & 3 response: Each paragraph responds to one different rhetorical element in the text that you feel strongly about. A response paragraph includes:

a. a topic sentence that identifies whether you will support or criticize a specific rhetorical element (language, structure, or appeals) the author uses

b. your own critical analysis of the rhetorical element using examples and supporting details

c. evidence from your own observations or those of other authors

4. A conclusion, including:

a. a brief summary of the author's main argument, original intended audience, purpose, and the text's key ideas

b. a restatement of your thesis

c. a concluding statement, such as a comment, prediction, or call to action

Thesis for SRP #2: Is the author effective in using their particular rhetorical approach to reach their original intended audience? If yes, what makes their approach effective? If no, what are the limitations of their approach?

Focus on two specific rhetorical elements for your evidence to support your position - language, structure, rhetorical appeals, and evidence are all fair game!

Thesis Self-Checklist:

1. Does your thesis include the name of the author to whom you are responding?

2. Have you stated your response to the rhetorical elements in the author's text?

3. Is your response to the author's rhetorical choices in this text?

4. Is your thesis clear?

5. Is your thesis debatable?

6. Can someone take the other side of your position?

7. Does your thesis give your reader a clear idea of what your paper will be about1) summarize the rhetorical elements of the text, and2) decide which of the rhetorical elements (language, structure, or rhetorical appeals) the author uses either effectively or not effectively enough in order to present their ideas to their original intended audience and to achieve their specific purpose.You must keep in mind that the original intended audience is a very narrow one, so your evaluation of the author's rhetorical elements has to be based on whether these elements are effective for the group of people originally meant to have read this text!In other words, if you personally disagree with the author's ideas or topic, you need to temporarily set your disagreement aside and read and then analyze the text both rhetorically AND objectively.