Reference no: EM131267525
In a well-written paper, relate your professional or personal experience in the business world to the readings for the week.
Identify and clearly define the relevant law, either defining a legal doctrine, provisions of a law, or elements of a specific cause of action.
Apply facts from your situation to the applicable law, doctrine or cause of action studied.
Does the result in this suggest a need for tort reform? Why or why not? In answering this question, make an argument for or against tort reform.
Clearly summarize lessons learned from the week as they apply to your fact pattern and make links to the readings and/or module.
Include new thoughts or ideas based on the module information. This is your reflection/insight that logically would flow from each information point presented.
Make sure your experience actually relates to the material for the week.
Sometimes students have difficulty identifying a personal or professional torts case. You may also research a torts case to discuss if you do not have a personal or professional experience to discuss. Be sure to complete all bulleted points above.
In the area of torts we see many causes of action that are comprised of "elements." Define each element and apply facts from your situation to the law or elements. For instance, if you write about a situation involving negligence, you would define negligence stating, "Negligence occurs where a person's conduct falls below the standard of care, resulting in a breach of duty which is the direct and proximate cause of injury to another person or thing. The elements of negligence are 1) duty; 2) breach; 3) causation; and 4) damages."
Your paper should be 2-3 pages in length, not including the title or references pages.
|
What interrogation tactic would use during interrogation
: Read the below link about Elizabeth Smart for some background information. Then view the first 20 minutes of the interrogation of Brain David Mitchell in reference to Elizabeth Smart's abduction and sexual assault. What interrogation tactic woul..
|
|
Draw the state diagram for the encoder
: If the code is used with hard decision decoding on a channel with crossover probability of p = 10-3, determine an upper bound on the average bit error probability of the code.
|
|
What is the ethical issue
: You work in the Ethics Department for ABC Company (ABC). Your department is dedicated to advising its employees about their ethical obligations in the corporate setting.
|
|
Discuss the validity of each statement
: Discuss the validity of each statement. If the statement is true, explain why. If not, give a counterexample.- The union of any two open intervals is an open interval.
|
|
Does the result in this suggest a need for tort reform
: Apply facts from your situation to the applicable law, doctrine or cause of action studied. Does the result in this suggest a need for tort reform? Why or why not? In answering this question, make an argument for or against tort reform.
|
|
Problem regarding the crows foot notation
: Create and E-R diagram following the crows foot notation. Identify max and min cardinality. Resolve any many- to many relationshops.
|
|
Draw the state transition diagram for this code
: Assuming that this code is used for binary data transmission over a binary symmetric channel with crossover probability of 10-3, find a bound on the resulting bit error probability.
|
|
How many of each type of ticket were sold
: A rock concert brought in $432,500 on the sale of 9,500 tickets. If the tickets sold for $35 and $55 each, how many of each type of ticket were sold?
|
|
Discuss what costume design tells the viewer about character
: Find an image or link of a play, film or television show. Select one character and discuss what the costume design tells the viewer about that character.
|