Reference no: EM131429350
Grant Proposal - Peer Reviews
The instructor will send you two de-identified grant proposals to review for this assignment . You will play the role of a grant reviewer by reading and giving feedback to two other students' grant proposals (proposals will be assigned at random).
The Grant Proposal - Peer Reviews
Must be three to six double-spaced pages in length (not including the title or reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Must address the following areas of the proposal you are reviewing:
Specific Aims: Does the proposed study seem adequate to achieve these specific aims?
Background: Does the literature review justify the need for the study? Are there any gaps or missing data in the literature review?
Significance: Does the proposed study improve scientific knowledge, technical capability and/or clinical practice?
Proposed Study: Does the proposed study methodology answer the hypotheses listed in the Background section? Is the proposed methodology sufficient to achieve the stated specific aims?
Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of paper you are reviewing
Reviewer's name
Course name and number
Instructor's name
Date submitted
Must use at least one peer-reviewed source in addition to the course text.
Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
By Day 1 of Week Five, the instructor will send you two de-identified grant proposals to review for this assignment . You will play the role of a grant reviewer by reading and giving feedback to two other students' grant proposals (proposals will be assigned at random).
The Grant Proposal - Peer Reviews
Must be three to six double-spaced pages in length (not including the title or reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Must address the following areas of the proposal you are reviewing:
Specific Aims: Does the proposed study seem adequate to achieve these specific aims?
Background: Does the literature review justify the need for the study? Are there any gaps or missing data in the literature review?
Significance: Does the proposed study improve scientific knowledge, technical capability and/or clinical practice?
Proposed Study: Does the proposed study methodology answer the hypotheses listed in the Background section? Is the proposed methodology sufficient to achieve the stated specific aims?
Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of paper you are reviewing
Reviewer's name
Course name and number
Instructor's name
Date submitted
Must use at least one peer-reviewed source in addition to the course text.
Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
|
What is the probability that the battery life
: a. What is the probability that the battery life for an iPad Mini will be 10 hours or less (to 4 decimals)? c. What is the probability that the battery life for an iPad Mini will be at least 11 hours (to 4 decimals)? d. What is the probability tha..
|
|
Explain what a quick-response manufacturing system
: What opportunities might current IMF lending policies to Third World nations create for international businesses? What threats might they create? Explain what a quick-response manufacturing system. Make sure you explain its 2 components as well as ho..
|
|
Sample variance of a random sample
: The sample variance of a random sample of 50 observations from a normal population was found to be s2 = 45. a. Can we infer at the 1% significance level that σ2 is less than 50?
|
|
Confidence interval estimate of the population mean
: a. Conduct the hypothesis test using a 0.05 level of significance and determine whether or not the company's claim is supported? b. Construct a 95% confidence Interval estimate of the population mean?
|
|
Does the literature review justify the need for the study
: Does the proposed study seem adequate to achieve these specific aims?Does the literature review justify the need for the study? Are there any gaps or missing data in the literature review?Does the proposed study improve scientific knowledge, technica..
|
|
Identify a problem in your current job or previous job
: Define Problem and Purpose statements. Then, identify a problem in your current job or previous job, such as inadequate use of technology, inefficient procedures, spotty customer service, poor product quality, low morale, or a personnel problem.
|
|
The secrets of great groups
: What best practice list would you generate to help other managers to use symbolism to improve group effectiveness?
|
|
Find the dynamic reactions at c and d
: A slender, uniform rod AB of mass m and a vertical shaft CD, each of length 2b, are welded together at their midpoints G. Knowing that the shaft rotates at the constant rate ω, determine the dynamic reactions at C and D.
|
|
What benefits make these risks worth taking
: Trust has become a key metric in measuring the success of SCM relationships. These relationships often seek to move beyond previous “transaction” based purchasing and procurement arrangements which where often adversarial to long-term relationships o..
|