Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
In 3-4 pages, analyze the following information, comments, and questions.
In U.S. v. Dickerson (2000), the U.S. Supreme Court held that Miranda was required by the Constitution and was not a court-made rule that could be overruled by Congress. The Fourth Circuit held otherwise. Which institution-the U.S. Supreme Court or the U.S. Congress-can most safely be entrusted with protecting citizens against abuses of government power? Since Miranda has been applied against the states for almost forty years since its inception, how can it be credibly be argued that it is just a rule for federal courts? This was a significant victory for the rights of suspects, but also a victory of the U.S. Supreme Court over Congress. Given the court's role in deciding the contested 2000 U.S. presidential election and its ability to rule authoritatively on some of society's most contentious issues, (e.g., abortion, school desegregation, affirmative action), is the U.S. Supreme Court now the most powerful branch of government? If so, is this a good thing?
Does the decision made by the Supreme Court in Dickerson have implications for the federal exclusionary rule? If Miranda is a command of the Constitution and cannot be overruled by Congress isn't the exclusionary rule a rule of the Constitution? The current U.S. Supreme Court position is that the exclusionary rule is a court-made rule and not a command of the Constitution. Can that logic survive Dickerson? Why or why not?
Who is legally responsible for the execution of management of a corporation ?
Explain Employment Law and Religious Officers and A devoutly religious office coordinator used the phrase Have a Blessed Day
Write paper on Crime and Behavior - Reaction
please evaluate the current and potential future relevance of the responsibility to protect in light of the case of
Why was the employer's questioning this employee illegal? If, as it appears, the termination was based on the employee's disability, is there any way the employer could defend its actions
drive-in dons fast food restaurant sells the most delicious burgers in town at the most affordable price. elementary
What issues regarding the livestock support the theory of arson? Explain how the butane torch could have gotten into the field where the cows were
a young man robbed a woman in a womens restroom at the washington national monument. during the robbery the woman had a
Counter-thesis and counter-argument In this part of the paper, the strongest objection to the thesis is presented along with an argument (probably briefer than the argument in Part Two) for that thesis.
The treaty and accompanying implementing legislation were approved
Discuss the possible tort liability in this incident. Assault, battery, infliction of emotional distress, and false imprisonment all should be explored.
Assume that two individuals, each of whom is engaged in the business of providing whale watching tours, jointly acquire a fishing vessel. Each individual uses the boat in his separate business, and neither accounts to the other for profits earn..
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +1-415-670-9521
Phone: +1-415-670-9521
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd