Reference no: EM133005137

Your paper will be a response to the film, Ghosts of Rwanda, a film revisiting the 1994 genocide committed by Hutu militias against rival Tutsi tribespeople resulting in nearly 500,000-800,000 civilian deaths. Book: Mingst, McKibben, Arreguín-Toft: Chapter 10 material on Human Rights. While the UN and powerful states have the authority if not the power in some cases to intervene militarily for humanitarian reasons, this does not seem to be the norm-again for many reasons.

While much has been said and done after WWII to try to protect vulnerable peoples within bad acting, failing, or failed states, including anti-genocide legislation and the more recent R2P (the right to protect) convention, you are still likely to see a failure to prevent human rights abuses either within or between states.

One stunning takeaway from this event is a tragic ‘success': all of the people, states, and institutions involved forged a successful temporary alliance to avoid a policy of humanitarian intervention that might have saved tens of thousands of lives! Your job is to apply what you have learned in the course readings to the case of the Rwandan massacre to explain how and why this happened and is likely to happen again. Please include Introduction Conclusion

1.How and why did it happen?

2. With so much talk of "Never Again" as well as human rights law criminalizing genocide, how and why did so many good, responsible people, states, and institutions agree to do nothing in the face of mass murder? Does the criminalization of genocide matter, or does it create more complication than it resolves?

3.Were some international actors or people more culpable than others?

4.Did the media play a role here as an early warning system, or worse, as an aid to the killing?

5.Does the current international norm known as R2P (the Right to Protect) seem a robust deterrent likely to change the desirability of states for military-based humanitarian intervention?

6.More recently, Yale Holocaust historian Tim Snyder has attempted to explain how so many civilians became complicit in helping Nazis commit mass murder in Eastern Europe. Massive numbers of civilians have been killed in Darfur (beginning in 2003, also referred to as genocide) and the Syrian civil war, with little robust willingness on the part of developed nations to militarily intervene-is there a pattern of conditions or behaviors here that triggers a ‘bystander' policy for states and international institutions?

7.Finally, why do you think Christian Churches, statesmen, and NGOs were not particularly different than others in their response to the Rwanda crisis? The Jewish and Christian faith traditions have traditionally asked, "Am I my brother's keeper?", a rhetorical question signaling our moral responsibility to safeguard the lives of humans as humans. But in cases like these it needs to be asked-why has the organized Church been slow to mobilize? Apart from humanitarian aid assistance, did they mobilize for Darfur and Syria?