Reference no: EM133374009
Miranda v Arizona:
1. Identify two parts of the constitution mentioned in the essays and explain what each part says.
2. Both authors agree about what the constitution says. Describe one other fact about which they both agree.
3. According to the Phoenix press, what is a questioning technique the police might use to get a guilty person to confess?
4. According to the Phoenix press, what is an example of a police questioning tactic that would be unconstitutional?
5. What are three police tactics, described by the Tucson times, intended to psychologically break a defendant?
6. According to the Tucson Times why will a requirement that police read defendants' their rights not make it more difficult to convict true criminals?
7. If you were a supreme court justice, would you rule that the actions by Arizona's police and prosecutor are constitutional or unconstitutional and why?
8. Do you think United States Supreme Court justices should be a elected by the people or be appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate as it is done now and why?