Reference no: EM133194284
Question 1.
How aggressive should a lawyer be in representing his or her client "zealously"? Read the rest of Judge Land's order in Note 3.31 "Hyperlink: A Question of Ethics". Do you think Orly Taitz's conduct warranted a twenty-thousand-dollar fine?
LEARNING OBJECTIVE 1: Identify the parties involved in litigation.
LEARNING OBJECTIVE 2: Explore the role of lawyers in our adversarial system.
LEARNING OBJECTIVE 3: Understand the roles and obligations of jurors.
Problem 1. Can you think of a situation where an in-house attorney may advise you to retain your own counsel?
Problem 2. Most rules of legal professional conduct are drafted and enforced by the bar itself, but the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (passed in reaction to the Enron accounting scandal) imposed a legal duty on lawyers to report acts of misconduct in publicly traded corporations. Do you believe that the bar does an effective job of policing itself, or do you think external government agencies should be more involved?
Problem 3. Read the legal documents available for the Lynne Stewart case at Note 3.28 "Hyperlink: The Lynne Stewart Case". Do you think that the U.S. government should be able to curb the attorney-client privilege when the client is a convicted terrorist? Or a suspected terrorist?
Problem 4. How aggressive should a lawyer be in representing his or her client "zealously"? Read the rest of Judge Land's order in Note 3.31 "Hyperlink: A Question of Ethics". Do you think Orly Taitz's conduct warranted a twenty-thousand-dollar fine?
Problem 5. Do you think that juries can be trusted to always arrive at the truth? Why or why not?
Problem 6. Do you think the U.S. jury system should be adopted by other countries? What factors do you think should affect a country's decision to adopt a jury system?
Question 2
Please respond to two other students' post
1. Student
I feel lawyer should be aggressive to a certain extent some lawyers are overly aggressive when often times it is not needed. I feel lawyers should be aggressive when it is needed, for example if a defendant is charged with murdering someone and has not came to truth with his/herself or the lawyer. I feel in this case the lawyer should be very aggressive. In other minimal cases such as petty theft there shouldn't be to much aggressiveness that should occur, but the lawyer should not take it easy on the defendant either.
Yes I feel Orly Taitz's deserves the $20,000 fine because the system and higher up's would not lie on her as well as make up any story for what she has done. I feel if the crime was committed she should definitely be punished for it no matter what. All rules and laws should be followed in order to obtain a steady career in the field of which she has signed up for.