Reference no: EM132085047

Prepare answers to the cases from this week's reading.

Case: Dilution of a Trade Mark

Case Questions

Critical Legal Thinking
Do you think that Congress often uses its "veto power" over the U.S. Supreme Court's interpretation of a federal statute by enacting another statute to change the result of a Supreme Court's decision?

Ethics
Do you think the Moseleys were trading off of Victoria's Secret famous name? Do you think that the Moseleys had a legitimate claim to their business names because the husband's name was Victor?

Contemporary Business
Did the change in the Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006 favor famous trademark holders?

Case: Holder in Due Course

Your responses should be well-rounded and analytical, and should not just provide a conclusion or an opinion without explaining the reason for the choice. For full credit, you need to use the material from the week's lectures, text, and/or discussions when responding to the questions.

It is important that you incorporate the question into your response (i.e., restate the question in your introduction) and explain the legal principle(s) or concept(s) from the text that underlies your judgment.

For each question you should provide at least one reference in APA format (in-text citations and references as described in detail in the Syllabus).

Each answer should be double spaced in 12-point font, and your response to each question should be between 300 and 1,000 words in length.

Submit this assignment as a single Word document covering both cases.

Attachment:- CASE.rar