Do you think it would be acceptable to include evidence

Reference no: EM133696402

Discussion Post

You are the fraud investigator on a case and you are certain the VP of Marketing has embezzled funds. The VP of Marketing has been under suspicion twice before on similar schemes but these suspicions were never proven. Do you think, in this case, it would be acceptable to include evidence from these prior situations in your investigation to ensure an arrest and conviction this time? Would your answer change if the VP of Marketing was convicted on the similar schemes? Why or why not? Be sure to back up your opinions with authoritative sources and applicable laws (including peer reviewed articles from the library, Fraud Examiners Manual, etc.

Reference no: EM133696402

Questions Cloud

Articles in business databases detailing recent development : Periodical database searches (articles in business databases detailing recent developments and important issues within companies and organizations).

Do you think the constitutional rights impede a fraud : Do you think these constitutional rights impede a fraud investigation and favor the employee or do you think these rights are necessary?

Presence of noncaseating granulomas : Histological assessment confirms the presence of noncaseating granulomas. Finish atten Question What is the most likely diagnosis?

Risk analysis by using the risk matrix : Risk analysis by using the Risk Matrix. which provides a comprehensive guide and recommendations for the project execution, control, and monitoring

Do you think it would be acceptable to include evidence : Do you think, in this case, it would be acceptable to include evidence from these prior situations in investigation to ensure arrest and conviction this time?

Describe the process of preparation : Describe the process of preparation that you should consider before visiting client's house.

How is this reflected in the value of the firms stock : What is the relationship between risk and return and how is this reflected in the value of the firm's stock? The cost of debt?

Provide specific examples of any legal aspects : Identify, discuss, and provide specific examples of any legal aspects that a fraud examiner must consider in each case with respect to the evidence.

You empower the person to identify and prioritise needs : Describe an assistance that you may seek from colleagues and experts. How can you empower the person to identify and prioritise the needs?

User Account

All Pages