Reference no: EM133205552
Question: The required text reference is worth 2 points. This is the text and not an outside source. An outside source or incomplete reference to our textbook will earn -0- points. Here is a suggested way to reference the text: Page 59 / Chapter 5/section 5.1 . It is important that business students pay attention to the details.
Questions 1, 2, and 3 are worth 1 point each. Question 4 is worth 2 points.
The overall brief analysis is worth 1 point.
The videos are in the Quiz itself.
Watch these two videos and the one companion article. They are about three highly publicized incidents where actions by employees forced each company to take a drastic and unusual action. As you watch, think about the ethics of what is happening. Then in 1-2 sentences per number, answer the questions. Spelling and grammar count. There must be at least one text reference (page/chapter/edition).
1. Do you think Dr. Gokal was acting ethically in the way he administered the vaccine? Why?
2. Should the doctors disclose this event to anyone and, if so, to whom? Why?
3. Read and watch the video on Katelyn Ohashi. Who do you see exhibiting unethical behavior? Explain?
4. Think about the Approaches to Ethical Reasoning, such as Duty-Based Ethics, Outcome Based Ethics etc. . Which approach do you think the doctors should use when handling their attendance at the NewTox event? Which approach did Judge Bynum use in regards to the vaccine situation? Which approach should have been used by the unethical party in the Ohashi case? Explain?