Hello I need Dissertation Research Proposal Report and the topic is -> "The Use of Software and Big Data in Human Resource Management" . The Report must be according to the Harvard Referencing Style and Without any plagiarism. I have attached some important documents in the list and these are the following details of the attached documents: -First file is the "Assessment Brief MBA Dissertation Research Proposal_V2_EUBS" in this file you have to read only Dissertation Research Proposal part. In this part you will see about the brief description of the Dissertation Research proposal report. -Second file is the "Dissertation Research Proposal 2017" this file is the example of Dissertation Research Proposal Report. Please Note: Number of words 3500 and please do not include the numbers of any table or any diagram. Total 3500 words without including the numbers of Table of Content and any diagram or flow chart. Please read all the files carefully. Thank You,

Plan and timetable 15% Outstanding and flawless. Eminently achievable by the deadlines and in the order stated, Achievable by the deadlines stated, order appropriate; Mostly doable with few amendments likely by the tutor; Generally doable with some amendments likely by the tutor; Possible doubts about doing it in time as stated; chapter titles Several doubts about doing it in time as stated; chapter titles Unrealistic listing of sequence; deadline points trivial or Missing. Wholly incorrect or not attempted. possibly more done than one would have expected; chapter headings tackle all the issues clearly and succinctly. chapter headings show that the presentation of the whole argument has been thought through. chapter headings show that the requirements for presentation of the argument have been grasped. chapter headings show that the requirements for presentation of the argument have been generally grasped. over-general, and do not clearly indicate the argument in sufficient detail. over-general and unclear. uninformative; chapter titles trivial.

Design of empirical investigation 25% Outstanding and flawless. Provides very clear indication of what empirical data/ material will be sought, from Provides clear indication of what empirical data/ material will be sought, from Provides rather clear indication of what empirical data/ material will be sought, from what sources, what sources, what sources, using what using what using what methods; methods; methods; mostly effectively appropriate appropriate justifies choice in justification of justification of relation to overall choice in relation choice (in research to overall relation to overall question/ aims research research and objectives; question/ aims question/ aims issues of and objectives; and objectives); sampling, issues of issues of validity, reliability, sampling, sampling,

Discussion of concepts, theory, literature Outstanding and flawless. Excellent discussion of key concepts, theories, and frameworks; very Very well- presented discussion of key concepts, theories, and Well-presented discussion of key concepts, theories, and frameworks; (25%) clear indication of systematic frameworks; clear indication of rather clear indication of search for systematic systematic relevant search for search for literature; relevant relevant appropriate and literature; literature; mostly thoughtful appropriate appropriate selection of selection of selection in research research relation to question and question and research objectives; very objectives; clear question and clear evidence of evidence of objectives; has critical approach critical approach mostly adopted a to literature to literature critical approach discussed; discussed; to literature;

Outstanding 100 Excellent (80-89) 85 Very Good (70-79) 75 Good (60-69) 65 Topic, objectives, research question Outstanding and flawless. Presents excellent rationale for choice of topic in terms of current Presents very good rationale for choice of topic in terms of interest and importance Presents good rationale for choice of topic in terms of interest and importance (10%) interest and importance for for policy and/or practice within a for policy and/or practice within a policy and/or business-related business-related practice within a field and field, although business-related contemporary; not particularly field; objectives research current; research clear, ambitious question neat, question neat but achievable; relevant, and and relevant research central to the without question reflects topic. necessarily being the most current the one that gets developments to the heart of and the topic. conversations on the topic.

• LITERATURE REVIEW (25%) o Has a comprehensive range of RELEVANT literature been used to discuss relevant concepts, models and theories? o Are the sources used up to date, and of sufficient academic weight? o Does the dissertation give evidence of a critical attitude towards source material? o Are the key themes and issues surrounding the research questions clearly drawn from the literature? o Have sources been acknowledged and cited fairly and properly, in accordance with the Harvard format? Is the references listing at the end of the dissertation complete and in the Harvard format?

Each of the assessment categories is elaborated below in the form of a checklist of questions. Please study the checklist of questions as you prepare relevant sections of your dissertation, and especially when you are editing the penultimate and final drafts of your dissertation. • INTRODUCTION, CONTEXT, RESEARCH OBJECTIVES (10%) o Is the research topic or problem clearly stated and shown to be worth investigating? o Has appropriate background information been provided with special terms and concepts defined? o Are the research objectives (research questions or hypotheses) clear, relevant, coherent and achievable? o Do objectives etc. go beyond mere description, i.e. do they involve explanation, comparison, criticism or evaluation?