It was my first time that I upheld your website services and I am really very much thankful that I ordered you this one. I would definitely going to share my experience with my friends and encourage them to use your services and experience the best part of it.. Again Thanks for your help...

Conclusions 35% Summary is a list of either pros and cons leading to a lopsided conclusion Summary recognizes differences but unable to resolve them, weak conclusion or jumps to conclusion Summary is balanced leading to a well-reasoned conclusion Summary leads to a surprise or original conclusion generating new issues 1 - 8 10 - 18 19 - 26 28 - 35 References 20% Sparse; little evidence of library skills Incorrect formatting Evidence of some search skills Standard references in mostly correct formatting Comprehensive, showing care in researching the issue, format correct and clear As in good effort, but uses unusual references to bolster an original argument Formatting as in good effort

Introduction 15% Gives enough to tell what the topic is but little prioritizing Describes topic, refers to past work, what is proposed to do here As in fair effort, but shows what past work has done/not done; logical progression to topic Interesting and complex account to why this topic, what questions need to be addressed, foretaste of original contribution 1 - 3 5 - 7 9 - 11 13 - 15 Body of discussion 30% Some relevant points in descriptive lists, mainly either pro or con More relevant points drawn from literature, lists both pros and cons, but has difficulty in making a convincing case Most/all relevant points from mainstream literature; uses appropriate structure to resolve issues in convincing argument. As in good effort, but makes an original case in own voice, well supported by resources/ references going well beyond the mainstream literature

1.0 Introduction Choose a ‘real’ case study and provide: Weighting 1.1 Background of the company 1.2 Company objectives (vision/ mission) 15% 1.3 Current business performance 2.0 Body of discussion 2.1 HR strategies 25% 2.2 Employee development 2.3 Employment relations & grievance handling 2.4 Training Use of diagrams/ models, tables and charts 5%

Please ensure that your assessment has all these required sections (failure to do so would subject to a penalty of loss of marks): Official EEI Cover Sheet Must be fully completed with ‘actual’ signature (NO typed in signature allowed) Table of contents This is mandatory to highlight each series of structured headings in the assessment. Page numbering is a requirement and listing must be reflect accuracy.

Format of assessment: • Cover page should include name, student number, unit number, unit name, assessment number, assessment name, and date (you can download this from Moodle) • Use Arial, Calibri, or Tahoma, 10 - 12 pt. font • Double spacing • Double justification of text • Headers and footers on all pages other than the cover page – headers and footers should contain your name and student number, the unit number and name, and a page number • Failure to adhere to the stipulated format, a penalty of marks reduction would be imposed. • If you have any questions about the assessment, ask your lecturer, or email to [email protected] .

General: • The Harvard Style of Referencing system is COMPULSORY. See ‘Notes on Plagiarism & Harvard Referencing’ for more information. • Students who have been found to have committed acts of Plagiarism are automatically considered to have failed the entire term. If found to have breached the regulation for the second time, they will be asked to leave the course. • Plagiarism involves taking someone else’s words, thoughts, ideas or essays from online essay banks and trying to pass them off as your own. It is a form of cheating which is taken very seriously. Take care of your work and keep it safe. Don’t leave it lying around where your classmates can find it.