Conclusion /5 Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments Consistency logical and convincing Mostly consistent logical and convincing Adequate cohesion and conviction The argument is confused and disjointed Reference style /5 Clear styles with an excellent source of references. Clear referencing style Generally good referencing style Sometimes clear referencing style Lacks consistency with many errors

Discussion on future computer networks /5 Excellent ability to comprehend the material and presented appropriately Excellent ability to comprehend the material and presented appropriately good effort in source reference material Ability to think critically but a poor source of reference Demonstrated ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately Did not demonstrate the ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately Discussion of future computer networking technologies /5 Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but did not source reference material appropriately Demonstrated ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately Demonstrated ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately Did not demonstrate the ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately

Internet speed comparison past, present and future /5 Excellent use of credible sources. Accurate referencing. Obvious that outstanding effort made Extremely good effort Good effort made but not outstanding Made some effort. For example, Web searches only Very little, attempt to reference. The lazy effort with inaccuracies Human-centric design aspects (present) /5 Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments Consistency logical and convincing Mostly consistent logical and convincing Adequate cohesion and conviction The argument is confused and disjointed

Human cantered design approach (past) /5 Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments Consistency logical and convincing Mostly consistent logical and convincing Adequate cohesion and conviction The argument is confused and disjointed A brief discussion of the present-day technology of computer network /5 All elements are present and very well integrated. Components present with good cohesive Components present and mostly well integrated Most components present The proposal lacks structure.

Example Marking Rubric for Assignment #: Total Marks 50 Note: The marking rubrics varies for each assignment Grade Mark HD 40-50 DI 35-44 CR 30-34 P 25-29 Fail <25 Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Introduction and Background /5 All topics are pertinent and covered in depth. Ability to think critically and source material is demonstrated Topics are relevant and soundly analysed. Generally relevant and analysed. Some relevance and briefly presented. This is not relevant to the assignment topic. Chronological development /5 Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but did not source reference material appropriately Demonstrated ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately Demonstrated ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately Did not demonstrate the ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately