Total 2500 words, i need only the a1.3 part to be done. Word Limit - 2500 words +/- 10% excluding report title page, table of contents, reference list and appendices. Submit ¬- in the A1.3 drop-box in the MMM132 Cloud site. Note: This drop-box is only available after you complete A1.1. All answers in this assessment must use academic sources (the textbook and peer reviewed academic journal articles) to define, describe, structure and support the information, discussion and analysis. Other sources can be used to provide information about your chosen organisation.

Recommended formatting - For A1.2 address and number the three tasks, For A1.3 address the four tasks in the body of your Business Report, For A1.3 use MMM132 Business Report Format, one main idea per paragraph, no single sentence paragraphs, paragraph maximum of 250 words, 1.5 space between lines, number the pages and use headings to help structure your assignment and be clear to the reader.

Submission Instructions - Submit A1.1 online. Submit A1.2 and A1.3 in MS Word (not PDF or Pages). Keep a backup copy of every assignment you submit until the marked assignment has been returned to you. In the unlikely event that one of your assignments is misplaced, you will need to submit your backup copy. When you are required to submit an assignment through your CloudDeakin unit site, you will receive an email to your Deakin email address confirming that it has been submitted. You should check that you can see your assignment in the Submissions view of the Assignment drop-box folder after upload, and check for, and keep, the email receipt for the submission.

Excellent use of the TOC structure/format. All sections are in included and layout is clear and consistent within the table. (0.8-1 marks) The fundamental theories relevant to this task and their application to the chosen organisation are clear, systematic and comprehensive. (3.2- 4 marks) Both text and highly relevant well applied management academic journal article(s). (0.8-1 marks) Both direct and indirect quotations included and in-text citations are completely error free.(0.8-1 marks) Five or more exceptionally well- selected journal articles in relation to the task and reference lists completely error free. Excellent organisational source and text included. (2.4-3 marks)

Excellent use of the required report structure/format. Report has a logical flow and coherent line of argument. (4-5 marks) The fundamental theories and practice relevant to this task are clearly identified and described comprehensively, suitable journal article(s) are used. Response delivers all relevant information necessary for full understanding. The context and the background are well explained (2.4-3 marks) The fundamental theories relevant to this task are clearly identified and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding. The context and background are well explained and suitable journal article(s) are used. A thorough analysis of information, identifying the key components of the theories and accurately and thoroughly distinguishes relevant from irrelevant details. (4.8-6 marks).

The fundamental theories relevant to this task are clearly identified and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding. The context and background are well explained and suitable journal article(s) are used. A thorough analysis of information, identifying the key components of the theories and accurately and thoroughly distinguishes relevant from irrelevant details. (4.8-6 marks) The fundamental theories relevant to this question are clearly identified and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information needed for full understanding. The context and background are well explained and suitable journal article(s) are used. Reflection demonstrates consistent and systematic reasoning and provides thorough discussion on the "cultural fit" in the organisation. (4.8-6 marks) Skillfully communicates meaning with high level of clarity and fluency. Writing is virtually error- free. Paraphrasing correctly portrays the ideas of others in student's own words. In-text citations are accurate and support the arguments made in the assignment very well. List of References presented very accurately using the Harvard style. (3.2-4 marks)