Reference no: EM131389292
L. G. and S. L. Patel, husband and wife, owned and operated the City Center Motel in Eureka. On April 16, Rajeshkumar, the son of L. G. and S. L., formed a partnership with his parents and became owner of 35 percent of the City Center Motel. The partnership agreement required that Rajeshkumar approve any sale of the motel. Record title to the motel was not changed, however, to reflect his interest.
On April 21, L. G. and S. L. listed their motel for sale with a real estate broker. On May 2, P. V. and Kirit Patel made an offer on the motel, which L. G. and S. L. accepted. Neither the broker nor the purchasers knew of the son's interest in the motel. When L. G. and S. L. notified Rajeshkumar of their plans, to their surprise, he refused to sell his 35 percent of the motel.
On May 4, L. G. and S. L. notified P. V. and Kirit that they wished to withdraw their acceptance. They offered to pay $10,000 in damages and to give the purchasers a right of first refusal for five years. Rather than accept the offer, on May 29, P. V. and Kirit filed an action for specific performance and incidental damages. L. G., S. L., and Rajeshkumar responded that the contract could not lawfully be enforced. Discuss who will prevail and why.
|
Explain whether national biscuit will able to recover value
: Explain whether National Biscuit will be able to recover the value of the bread delivered to the Food Center from Stroud and the partnership.
|
|
Two goods pure exchange economy
: Suppose there is a two-person and two goods pure exchange economy in which both persons have the same, strictly convex utility function and their utilities are increasing in their consumption of both goods . Would an allocation where one person has a..
|
|
What characteristics make them stand out
: Personal branding is an essential element for marketing yourself and the skills that make you successful. According to Khedher (2014), "Individuals involved in personal branding develop their human capital by investing in continuous learning; enha..
|
|
Explain who is correct in given contention
: Hodge denies this and sues for specific performance, claiming that Voeller had actual and apparent authority to bind the partnership. The partners argue that Voeller had no such authority and that Hodge knew this. Who is correct? Explain.
|
|
Discuss who will prevail and why
: Kirit filed an action for specific performance and incidental damages. L. G., S. L., and Rajeshkumar responded that the contract could not lawfully be enforced. Discuss who will prevail and why.
|
|
Draw a state diagram that implements this specification
: Draw a state diagram that implements this specification using as few states as possible. (Hint: It is possible to implement this machine in six or fewer states.)
|
|
List an appropriate traditional training method
: Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia. As the banking industry struggled to recover from the recent financial crisis and recession (and new regulations) that followed, SunTrust's management deci..
|
|
Does the dissolution of the partnership relieve davis
: Credit Bureaus of Merced County, as assignee of these three accounts, sued the partnership as well as Shipman and Davis individually. Does the dissolution of the partnership relieve Davis of personal liability for the accounts? Explain.
|
|
Explain who is correct in given contention
: VAC denies that the course of dealings between VAC and Jupe was the type from which an agreement to discharge Nabors could be inferred. Who is correct? Explain.
|