Total 1000 words. I need to write this assignment with some relevant case examples. And Australian Consumer Law and Australian Competition and Consumer Commission also needed to be searched for the thing. The assignment needed to be done in IRAC model. And if things can be done like 1.Introduction, 1.1 Overview, 2. Australian Consumer Law, 2.1Consumer Guarantee, Issue, Rule, Application, 3.Manufacturer Guarantee, 4. Other Risk, 4.1 Contractual, 4.2 Negligence and 5. Conclusion. No fuzz writing all the words and legislations and case examples taken from the book Law In Commerce 6th edition by Brendan Sweeney, Jennifer O'Reilly, Andrew coleman and with the assistance from Australian consumer law and ACCC. This link may be helpful to you very much.

The mid-semester assessment is due on 29 at 17.00 pm. It can only be submitted online through TurnItIn. Note that the system does allow for earlier submission and resubmission until the due date! Assessment Value - This assessment task is worth 20% of your result in the unit. Style - The paper should be typed with 12 pt character – any fonts type - and 1.5 line spacing fully justified paragraphs and 3cm margins on A4 pages. Format - The first page is a title page which includes: your name; student ID; tutorial day & time; tutor’s name; and word count. This is to be followed by the first page of the assessment (numbered pg 1 – the title page is not numbered). Your assessment must be ONE document only, preferably in .pdf format, but acceptable as a .doc or .docx if you can't create a pdf. No other formats will be accepted.

References and Research - Cases can be referred to by just using the parties names, i.e. Donoghue v Stevenson or its commonly used ‘nickname’ such as Snail in a Bottle. Make sure that we can identify the case though. Statutes can be referred to by their short name, i.e. Australian Consumer Law or ACL. No other references are needed or should be used. For example referencing powerpoints or the textbooks is not acceptable. The only acceptable sources for this assessment are the primary sources such as cases and statutes for this assessment.

In short, you acknowledge that - The work is your own work. You have not previously submitted all or part of this work for assessment in any subject, unless the subject coordinator for the current subject (or your research supervisor, if applicable) has given you written permission to reuse specific material and you have correctly referenced the material taken from your own earlier work. You have read and agree to be bound by the Statutes, Regulations and Policies of the University relating to Academic Integrity and You may be subject to student discipline processes in the event of an act of academic misconduct by me including an act of plagiarism or cheating.

Submission Details - The mid-semester assessment can only be submitted online through TurnItIn. Note that the system does allow for earlier submission. Penalties for Late Lodgement - The standard penalty for late submission of assessment tasks is 5% of the marks for that task for each delay in submission of a day or partial day up to a maximum of five (5) working days after the due date. Assessment tasks will not be accepted after the earlier of the following occurrences: The fifth (5th) working day after the due date; or Feedback on the assessment task has been returned to any student by the teaching team member.

Fulfils the task and answers correctly. Identifies the salient case law or statutory law. Identifies the salient arguments for and against a position. Appropriate use of discipline specific language with sound understanding of the underlying concepts. Presentation format and style engaging and highly appropriate for the audience. Logical flow of ideas and content in the right sections. Coherence between and within sections.

Title and headings are present, clear, reflect on and relate to each other. Thoughtfully evaluates alternative points of view. Draws justified conclusions based on clearly explained reasons. Please note that the marking criteria do not carry equal weight. Furthermore, some of them might not be applicable to a particular question. So they are only indicative as to how you went overall in the assessment task not a specific question.