5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

10.0 %Format 5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

5.0 %Includes Two Additional Scholarly Research Sources With In-text Citations None of the required elements (two topic-related scholarly research sources and two in-text citations) are present. Not all required elements are present. One or more element is missing and/or an included source(s) is not scholarly research or topic-related. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, but the source and quality of one reference is questionable. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, and obtained from reputable professional sources. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources.

15.0 %Evaluate the Best Method of Addressing These Issues in A Supervision Plan and Include A Model of Supervision That Could Be Used Evaluation of the best method of addressing multicultural issues identified and a model of supervision that can be used is not presented. Evaluation of the best method of addressing multicultural issues identified and a model of supervision that can be used is present. Discussion is absent or inadequate. Evaluation of the best method of addressing multicultural issues identified and a model of supervision that can be used is present, but done at a cursory level. Evaluation of the best method of addressing multicultural issues identified and a model of supervision that can be used is clearly presented. Discussion is convincing. Evaluation of the best method of addressing multicultural issues identified and a model of supervision that can be used is clearly presented. Discussion is thorough and insightful.

20.0 %Discuss Two Examples of Multicultural Issues Two examples of multicultural issues are not present. Two examples of multicultural issues are present. Argument, and/or discussion is absent or inadequate. Two examples of multicultural issues are present, but done at a cursory level. Two examples of multicultural issues are clearly presented. Argument supports claims and is convincing. Discussion is convincing. Two examples of multicultural issues are clearly presented. Argument supports claims and is insightful and convincing. Discussion is thorough and insightful.

Please see attached document with instruction. Please make sure grammar is correct all research must be from only.Thank you. All research references must be from only Content 30.0 %Identify the Reasons Given by the APA for Encouraging the Inclusion of Multicultural Awareness to the Supervision Process Reasons for encouraging the inclusion of multicultural awareness in the supervision process are not present. Reasons for encouraging the inclusion of multicultural awareness in the supervision process are present. Discussion is absent or inadequate. Reasons for encouraging the inclusion of multicultural awareness in the supervision process is present, but done at a superficial level. Reasons for encouraging the inclusion of multicultural awareness in the supervision process are clearly presented. Discussion is thorough. Reasons for encouraging the inclusion of multicultural awareness in the supervision process are clearly presented. Discussion is detailed and insightful.