Reference no: EM13894894
Assignment-
Understand the following terms, using the information you have learned so far in the course: Please give detailed answers
a) convective cooling b) data support for multiple hypothesis c) modeled data and observational data d) types of data used e) uncertainty in data Summarize the importance of these five issues. Is the PPT presenting valid points? Is the analysis complete? Has the author reliably presented the subject or is she concealing bias?
2) Read the abstracts and try to understand the gist (and some but not all of the technical details) of the two paper incuded in the package on scientific conclusions in the presence of uncertainty. Of the two scientific papers, one,"Possible artifacts of date biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus," suggests temperatures have been underestimated and one, "Antarctic Ice," suggests that antarctic ice growth has been underestimated. Are you convinced? Why?
3) Evaluate the paper titled, "Seepage: Climate change denial and its effect on the scientific community." The paper states: Vested interests and political agents have long opposed political or regulatory action in response to climate change by appealing to scientific uncertainty. Here we examine the effect of such contrarian talking points on the scientific community itself. Are you convinced? Why?
4) Is Kuhn's concept of "paradigms" relevant to the above tasks? How?
5) Discuss the terms "charisma" that was featured in the Uncertainty in Climate Science PPT and the term "seepage" used in the paper "Seepage: Climate change denial and its effect on the scientific community" Are these appropriate terms to be used in the Uncertainty in Climate Science PPT and in the paper? Do these two items meet standards of scientific inquiry that you feel are important to arrive at conclusions.
6) Present your own views on how good our climate science is and how good our public discussion and policy making on climate science are? Does the information presented in the four items in the Course Document package for this Discussion Forum change your view in any way? How?
Assume that in a household one parent currently works
: 1.Assume that in a household one parent currently works full time and the other stays at home to look after the family.
|
What are the main causes for fungal eye infections
: How does such a sensitive organ protect itself against such common infections and What could compromise the eye's ability to protect itself from such infections?
|
Select an organizational issue
: 700 words Select an organizational issue, problem, or topic that you would like to research. Write a narrative about your proposed research. Include the following information:The business, organizational problem, or topic
|
What are consequences of someone entering an incorrect rule
: What are the consequences of someone entering an incorrect rule? Offer both mundane and drastic examples. Considering your answer to part b, if you managed the reservation system at THL.
|
Discuss the terms charisma
: Discuss the terms "charisma" that was featured in the Uncertainty in Climate Science PPT and the term "seepage" used in the paper "Seepage: Climate change denial and its effect on the scientific community"
|
What is meant by the term enteric pathogen
: What are the indole test, methyl red test, voges-proskauer test and citrate test (IMViC) reactions? Describe in detail all four reactions (what media is used, important ingredients, what each reaction measures, and what positive and negative resul..
|
What additional information would you like to have
: What additional information would you like to have had in order to ensure that your decision was the right one?
|
What role did the church play in the daily lives
: What role did the church play in the daily lives of the medieval public andWhere these characters truly concerned about religion above all else during the spiritual pilgrimage described
|
What the quality of their previous work
: Unfortunately the peer-review process involves knowing who the scientist is, what the quality of their previous work is etc. Just hiding the names, probably isn't good enough anyway
|