1-9% The answer to the task demonstrates no evidence of any information base and no understanding of the discipline and its ethical dimension 0% Awarded for (i) non-submission; (ii) dangerous practice and; (iii) in situations where the student fails to address the assignment brief (e.g.: answers the wrong question) and/or related learning outcomes

30-39°A A marginal fail in module outcome(s) related to GLO at this level. Possible compensation. Satisfies qualifying mark The answer to the task demonstrates a limited knowledge base; limited understanding of discipline and its ethical dimension 20-29% Fails to achieve module outcome(s) related to this GLO. Qualifying mark not satisfied No compensation available The answer to the task demonstrates little evidence of an information base. Little evidence of understanding of discipline and its ethical dimension 10-19°A The answer to the task demonstrates an inadequate information base. Inadequate understanding of discipline and its ethical dimension

60-69% The answer to the task demonstrates good knowledge base; explores and analyses the discipline, its theory and ethical issues with some originality, detail and autonomy 50-59cYo The answer to the task demonstrates a satisfactory knowledge base that begins to explore and analyse the theory and ethical issues of the discipline 40-49% A marginal pass in module outcbme(s) related to GLO at this level The answer to the task demonstrates a basic knowledge base with some omissions and/or lack of theory of discipline and its ethical dimension

Mark Bands Outcome Module Learning Outcomes 1 & 2 (Academic Regulations, Section 2) Knowledge & Understanding Characteristics of Student Achievement by Marking Band 90-100% Achieves module outcome(s) related to GLO at this level The answer to the task demonstrates an exceptional information base exploring and analysing the discipline, its theory and ethical issues with extraordinary originality and autonomy. With some additional effort, work may be considered for intemal publication 80-89% The answer to the task demonstrates an outstanding information base exploring and analysing the discipline, its theory and ethical issues with clear originality and autonomy 70-790/0 The answer to the task demonstrates an excellent knowledge base, exploring and analysing the discipline, its theory and ethical issues with considerable originality and autonomy

Table 2: ARU level 5 marking criteria Level 5 reflects continuing development from Level 4. At this level, students are not fully autonomous but are able to take responsibility for their own learning with some direction_ Students are expected to locate an increasingly detailed theoretical knowledge of the discipline within a more general intellectual context, and to demonstrate this through forms of expression which go beyond the merely descriptive or imitative. Students are expected to demonstrate analytical competence in terms both of problem identification and resolution, and to develop their skill sets as required.

03-Analysis of needs at different There is no analysis of needs of any family members and how unmet individual needs impact the family member's development. (0 - 9) Inadequate analysis of any family members and how unmet individual needs impact the family member's development (9 _ 12) Satisfactory analysis of two family members and how unmet individual needs impact the family member's development. Little evidence of independence research. (12 - 18) A go od a na I ysis of two family members and how unmet individual needs impact the family member's development. Good evidence of originality with a good level of independent research. (18-21) An excellent analysis of two family members and how unmet individual needs impact the family member's development. Excellent evidence of originality and an excellent level of independent research. (21 - 24) (24 - 30) An outstanding analysis of two family members and how unmet individual needs impact the family , Recycle stages - (30):

01-Discussion of lifecvcle stages - (30): There is no discussion of the lifecycle stages of the family members presented in the scenario (0 - 9) Inadequate discussion of the lifecycle stages of the family members presented in the scenario. Life stages may be irrelevant to the scenario. (9 - 12) There is some discussion of some of the lifecycle stages of the family members presented in the scenario. The discussion is mainly descriptive. (12 - 18) A good discussion of the lifecycle stages of the family members presented in the scenario. All life stages, relevant to the scenario are discussed with some links to theory (18 - 21) An excellent discussion of the lifecycle stages of the family members presented in the scenario. All life stages, relevant to the scenario are discussed with relevant links to literature (21 - 24) An outstanding discussion of lifecycle development that is relevant to the case study. Autonomous research with originality of content. (24 - 30) Discuss the different life stages of the life cycle of the family members presented in the scenario. Discuss the

Table 1: Marking Rubric CRITERIA/GRADE 9:11: No evidence of Knowledge.: No evidence of Academic/ Expressive/ Professional skills.: 30 - 39: IP ....• 52 : Basic to satisfactory knowledge-Use of scholarly conventions inconsistent.: Basic to satisfactory Academic/ Expressive/ Professional skills.: 60- 69: Good analysis- consistent use of scholarly conventions.: Good Academic/ Expressive/Professional skills.: 70 - 79: 80 - 100: Outstanding to exceptional analysts-Work pushes the boundaries of the discipline and may be considered for external publication.: Outstanding to exceptional Academic/ Expressive/ professional skills and creativity.: Little evidence of knowledge.: Little evidence of use of scholarly conventions.: Excellent analysis-high level of intellectual rigour and consistency.: Excellent Academic/ Expressive/ Professional skills.:

In order to achieve full marks, you must submit your work before the deadline. Work that is submitted late — up to five working days after the published submission deadline - will be accepted and marked. However, the element of the module's assessment to which the work contributes will be capped with a maximum mark of 40%.

• This assignment must be completed individually. • You must use Harvard referencing system. • Your work must indicate the number of words you have used. Do not exceed the maximum number of words specified above; all assignments which do so will be penalised. ALL WORDS BEYOND THE WORD LIMIT WILL NOT BE MARKED. • Assignment submissions are to be made anonymously. Do not write your name anywhere on your work. Write your student ID number at the top of every page. • Where the assignment comprises more than one task, all tasks must be submitted in a single document. • You must number all pages.