Further Discuss Poor Fair Good Excellent (4 marks max.) further by Brief answer, but Fairly well Sufficiently Comprehensive making the does not show written, but detailed answer, answer, connection much lacking in details supported by supported by between the understanding with somewhat well-labelled relevant and fully concepts/ideas in unclear diagram(s) labelled the article, and diagram(s) diagram(s) support your discussion with relevant diagram(s).

1 mark 2 marks 3 marks 4 marks Identify (2 marks max.) Fair Vague identification Good Clear identification Explain (4 marks max.) to showing understanding of learning objectives Poor Brief presentation, but does not show much understanding Fair Fairly well presented, but lacking in details Good Sufficiently detailed presentation, with some reference to article content Excellent Comprehensive presentation of answer, with references to article content, integrated into explanation

Applications for extension of time – All applications for an extension of the time allocated to an assessment task must be made in writing to the Team Leader (see special consideration for within trimester assessment on Moodle). Approval, if granted, will be communicated in writing.

It must be submitted typed, one-sided, and double spaced on white A4 paper. Work submitted for assessment must be accompanied by a completed copy of the Cover Sheet (available on Moodle). No assignment will be accepted or marked if it is not accompanied by a signed Cover Sheet with your name, I.D. number, the tutorial day/time, and the name of the tutor on the Cover Sheet. An electronic copy will not be accepted. You should retain a copy of the work submitted. Faculty Style Guide – Work submitted for this assignment must follow the Faculty Style as outlined in the Faculty Q Manual. Copies of this manual can be obtained at the bookshop or online.