Discuss the relevant laws of evidence applied in the case

Assignment Help Other Subject

Reference no: EM133682798

Case: Fowkes v The King [2023] VSCA 160

Critically Evaluate

Undertake a close reading of the case.

Explain clearly and succinctly the relevant detail of the case.

Discuss the relevant laws of evidence applied in the case.

Consider the legal context of the law.

Explain the reasoning of the judge(s).

It is expected that you will:

Identify the legal process involved. Is it a trial? A pre-trial determination? A ruling on a Voir Dire? An appeal? Or an application for leave to appeal?

What is the law applying to the process? What is its source: legislation, or common law?

What are the legal criteria that apply in resolving the issues raised?

In respect of both legislation and common law:

Is any further guidance on the interpretation and application of the provision to be found in authoritative texts such as Cross or Odgers?

Does the application of the law support the broader objectives of the area of law involved? For example, if it is criminal law does it promote the effective and efficient enforcement of the criminal law?

Does the application of the law support the broader objectives of the rule of law in a democratic state including equality before the law and respect for the rights and dignity of individuals?

Reference no: EM133682798

Questions Cloud

Discuss the fears about intrusive press coverage : Discuss the fears about intrusive press coverage, unwanted publicity, and victim-blaming accusations that discourage some sexual assault victims

Assume that ernst blofeld is criminal mastermind : Assume that Ernst Blofeld is a criminal mastermind. He had many henchmen who carry out his criminal desires.

Jussie smollett indictment dismissal : Find an article about the Jussie Smollett indictment dismissal.

Joe lures leon up to the roof of building on some pretext : Assume Joe hates his boss, Leon. They both work in a sixty- story office building. Joe lures Leon up to the roof of the building on some pretext.

Discuss the relevant laws of evidence applied in the case : Explain clearly and succinctly the relevant detail of the case. Discuss the relevant laws of evidence applied in the case.

Motorists shall be liable for foreseeable harm : Section 100 provides as follows: "Motorists shall be liable for the foreseeable harm or damage caused by their driving.

Community corrections and the more successful alternatives : Explain community corrections and the more successful alternatives. Why do you think they are more successful?

Consider the scheme to be tax avoidance : Yew Tree Pty Ltd is the manager of a large shopping complex in suburban Melbourne. The Australian Tax Office (ATO) consider the scheme to be tax avoidance.

Neighbor started to tell about the prior shooting : When the paralegal in the civil parrot case was interviewing the neighbor, the neighbor started to tell about the prior shooting.

User Account

All Pages