Reference no: EM133749256
Research section:
1. One or two sentences on the life of each artist if known.If the artist is not known, then discuss the period of the work.How do these works fit into the overall oeuvre of these creators or periods?Briefly compare and contrast your main work with one or more also created by that artist or created within that period.
2. Historical and stylistic period of the works.Be sure to include the dates of all the works, the dates of the periods into which they fall, and the style of those periods.Are these works good examples of their period or do they deviate from the normal standards of that style?If so, how do they so deviate?
Analysis Section:
1.This section should be composed of mostly your own ideas, but you must footnote any ideas that you have drawn from others.
2.Discuss how these works fit into the oeuvre of the artist or period.
a. Analyze the composition of both works in detail.Discuss exactly what you see in terms of line, shape, color, depth, perspective, dynamics, texture, form and content, etc.Give this detailed description in your own words.Get someone else to read the paper and see if they can visualize the works.If they cannot, then rewrite it with more details.
b. Discuss the purpose of these works and how they reflect that function.
Were they are large commission for a temple or a smaller, more intimate piece?Do they succeed?Why or why not?
c. Discuss the meaning inherent in the pieces.What forms from past works of art are used to enhance that content?Do research, if necessary, to understand the mythological or religious subjects.
d. Note influences from past styles evident in the works.How do these works differ from those past works that may have inspired them?Are they more or less successful?Why or why not?
3.Give a conclusion summing up your main points in regard to your works and their creators.