Reference no: EM132914124

· A, food checker for 15 years in a known restaurant in Malate, had a heated argument with B, his manger. A meted out a 10-day suspension but she refused to acknowledge the notice of suspension. After the lapse of her suspension, A no longer reported to his office despite the repeated demands from B. As a result, A was dismissed from employment on the ground of abandonment. Is the act justified?

· Pursuant to said contract, Menor went to her aunt's residence on June 12, 1991 a Wednesday to deliver petitioners travel documents and plane tickets. Petitioner, in turn, gave Menor the full payment for the package tour. Menor then told her to be at the Ninoy Aquino International Airport (NAIA) on Saturday, two hours before her flight on board British Airways.

Without checking her travel documents, petitioner went to NAIA on Saturday, June 15, 1991, to take flight for the first leg of her journey from Manila to Hong Kong. To petitioners dismay, she discovered that the flight she was supposed to take had already departed the previous day. She learned that her plane ticket was for the flight scheduled on June 14, 1991. She thus called up Menor to complain.

Discuss the legal implication of the case given above.

· For being disrespectful to her superior, B, a cook/reliever in a hospital for 17 years was dismissed from employment. The said disrespectful was her angry reaction to the defamatory remarks made by her superior that she was responsible for the loss of food and supplies. On the contrary, this was the first offense of B. Is the dismissal lawful?

· A room boy in Tuna Hotel was dismissed for blurting out against his supervisors in their absence, but promptly reported to them the following remarks: "Mga gago silang lahat" or "They are all fools." Is the dismissal of the said room boy justified?