Reference no: EM132372280
INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE INDIVIDUAL CASE STUDY ASSIGNMENT
(WRITTEN REPORT)
Case study
You are member of an investigation team to research and report on the “true and fair” status of the financial statements of a high profile international company and to critique on the opinion given in the “Independent Audit report” and importantly focussing on the details given in “Key Audit Matters” by this company’s Auditor.
Required
You need to investigate the facts of the case study and using the risk-based auditing approach, auditing concepts, auditing standards and case laws and other information which you have learnt in this unit, such as:
ASA 315 - Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement through Understanding the Entity and Its Environment
ASA 320 - Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit
ASA 330 – The Auditor’s Responses to Assessed Risks
ASA 560 - Subsequent Events
ASA 570 - Going Concern
ASA 700 - Forming an Opinion and Reporting on a Financial Report
ASA 705 - Modifications to the Opinion in the Independent Auditor’s Report
ASA 706 – Emphasis of Matter Paragraph and Other Matter Paragraphs in the Independent Auditor’s Report
APES 110-Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants
The above list is only illustrative and your case study report is not required to address all the above mentioned topics. You can include other auditing standards covered in this unit, as related to this company.
You need to discuss the impact and relationship of the auditing standards so determined above, in the context of auditing theories, concepts, regulations, practices and other topics which you have learnt in this unit, such as:
Business risk
Corporate Governance
Ethics and culture
Whistle-blowing
Inherent and control risks
Action by creditors, shareholders and regulatory agencies
Internal control
Reporting obligation of auditors
Auditor’s negligence and contributory negligence
Auditors independence, duties and continuity
Aggressive accounting policies used in financial statement
Fraud and misappropriations
Regulatory bodies
The above list is again illustrative only and your case study report is not required to address all the above mentioned auditing standards. You can include other topics of this unit, as related to the company assigned to you for investigation.
And then derive your conclusions and recommendations.
Please use the Australian Standards of Auditing (ASA) even if they are NOT Australian companies, as they are based on International Standards of Auditing (ISA) in order to derive your conclusions and recommendations.
The length of this case study written report is 23 pages (+/- 2 pages) in PDF or Word format using Ariel 12pt font, 1.5 spacing, excluding any Appendices (for data, tables, graphs and diagrams) and references at the end in PDF or Word format.
Important:
Please ensure that the written report has the following six (6) main headings in its structure.
Executive Summary
Problem Statement
Methodology
Findings
Implications of findings
Conclusions and recommendations
Unit Learning Outcomes
At the end of this unit you will be able to:
1. Recommend/use audit concepts and techniques and apply relevant rules and regulations (including auditing standards) in addressing the problem/issue.
2. Examine cases/scenarios and identify problems/ issues (including ethical issues) involved.
3. Select relevant data and contextual factors to evaluate risks or impact on diverse stakeholders, where relevant.
4. Establish criteria/assumptions to be used to solve problems/issues or to make judgments.
5. Solve the problem by issuing the conclusion/judgment/decision, audit opinion, recommendations for action where appropriate.
Course Learning Outcomes
Your learning in this unit will contribute to the development (or demonstrate your attainment) of the following Course Learning Outcomes:
CLO2: Apply critical thinking and technical skills to solve authentic business problems [AQF S2, S3].
2.1. Conceptualise problems or situations (investigate, analyse, synthesize and evaluate);
2.2. Apply technical skills to authentic situations;
2.3. Solve complex problems;
2.4. Critically reflect on processes and assumptions.