Reference no: EM132520335
Assignment: In this assignment, you will examine a news report on scientific studies of the Colorado River water crisis. We will follow the same approach and the same questions that you learned to use in the Science Tool Kit activities in previous modules. In this assignment, you will take these questions and create an essay in which you can show your ability to more deeply examine the problem and the reporting, as well as the science behind the news story.
Completing this activity will assist you in mastering Module Level Outcome 3 and 4.
First, read:
• Davis, T. (2015, September 13). Study: Colorado River shortage could hit Arizona hard. Arizona Daily Star (Tucson, AZ).
• Katel, P. (2011, December 9). Water crisis in the west. CQ Researcher, 21, 1025-1048.
• Zielinski, S. (2010) The Colorado River Runs Dry. Smithsonian Magazine
View:
• Smithsonian Institute Climate Change and the Colorado River [Video, 03:08 mins]
• Liquid assets: The big business of water [Video, 42:49 mins]. (2010). In Films On Demand. Retrieved June 13, 2016
Next, submit the following:
You will write an essay of 1000+ words (4 pages), not including a title page and a reference page. Each of the following questions should be addressed in your essay and supported with both quotations and paraphrasing from multiple sources you have been given in the module on this topic and that you locate through the EC Library.
1. What is the source of the scientific information in the Arizona Daily Star article by Tony Davis?
2. Discuss the expertise of the scientists (and others) involved in the study discussed by Davis.
3. What alternative views does Mr. Davis discuss? What do these viewpoints say in contrast to the initial study he examined in his article? Would you say, based on this information, that the study examined by Mr. Davis is accurate, reliable, and unbiased?
4. Compare and contrast the information in this Arizona Daily Star article with the information in the module readings and any additional material you may have found about this complex issue. Where does the Daily Star article agree and disagree with your other sources, and why?
5. Who are the major stakeholders in the conflicting demands on the Colorado River source? Does Mr. Davis discuss them all fairly? Is one group overlooked; if so, who, and what is their interest in the Colorado River water?
6. What possible solutions to this problem are discussed in Mr. Davis' article? Are there other solutions you have found? Describe these possible solutions.
|
Parts of photosynthesis would completely stop
: Each statement below is FALSE. describe WHY IT IS FALSE and HOW TO MAKE THE STATEMENT TRUE.
|
|
What do you see as the major environmental drawbacks
: What do you see as the major environmental drawbacks and advantages of each source - tap and bottled? Consider concerns such as wasted water in the supply.
|
|
Compute net present value and payback period
: Compute net present value, and internal rate of return. Presentation Graphics prepares slides and other aids for individuals making presentations.
|
|
Advantages and limitations of the 8 kingdom system
: What are the advantages and limitations of the 8 kingdom system?
|
|
Discuss the expertise of the scientists involved in study
: Discuss the expertise of the scientists (and others) involved in the study discussed by Davis. What alternative views does Mr. Davis discuss?
|
|
Authority-competition-confrontation-dependency-empowerment
: Authority, competition, confrontation, dependency, empowerment, intergroup conflict, negotiation, organizational politics, power, or rational model.
|
|
Should buy the new digital printing system
: Based on the following, should we buy this new digital printing system? Use the table below to plan your cash flows. Bold boxes are where should go
|
|
What piece of advice might you give to a company person
: What good things have you seen that make it easier for a potential candidate to use? What difficulties have you seen in using these sites to look for a job?
|
|
Compute the amount of dividends received
: Seaside Developments Inc. has $200,000 of no par value 4% cumulative preferred shares, Compute the amount of dividends received by the common shareholders
|