Reference no: EM131726985

Assignment

To complete this assignment, you will first read a book excerpt about critical thinking processes: "The Believing Game and How to Make Conflicting Opinions More Fruitful" by Peter Elbow. Next, you will review the Procon Website in order to gather information. Then, you will engage in prewriting to examine your thoughts.

When looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking.

To complete this assignment, you will write a three to four page paper in which you:

1. State your position on the topic you selected for Assignment 1.1., which you submitted.

2. Identify three premises (reasons) from the Procon website that support your position and explain why you selected these specific reasons.

3. Explain your answers to the "believing" questions about the three premises opposing your position from the Procon website.

4. Examine at least two types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position.

5. Discuss the effects of your own enculturation (meaning your own upbringing and experiences) or group identification that may have influenced your biases.

6. Discuss whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the "Believing Game," even if your position on the issue has stayed the same.

The paper should follow these guidelines for clear and organized writing:

• Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph.

• Address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.

• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA Style format.

• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student's name, the professor's name, the course title, and the date.

Below is what I have already turned in, the professor said this about my paper " This paper is on the right track . The challenge is mainly around the Believing Game questions, where you need to really get into the perspective of an opposing viewpoint. Your paper, however, is more an exploration of the issue of banning books. What you needed to do was to, in essence, try to support an opposing viewpoint. Doing this helps you to better understand the strengths and weaknesses of your own viewpoint." So it will really need to show an opposing viewpoint.

Attachment:- Banned-Books.rar